47 pages • 1 hour read
Elizabeth Barrett BrowningA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In a poem that Barrett Browning calls the “most mature” of her works, the narrator, a struggling poet, bears a close resemblance to Barrett Browning herself, and this is a deliberate and explicit choice on the part of the poet. In the first book, as Aurora, Barrett Browning proclaims:
I who have written much in prose and verse
For others’ uses, will write now for mine,—
Will write my story for my better self,
As when you paint your portrait for a friend (Book 1, Lines 2-5).
This unusual boldness contributes to the poem’s uniqueness and ingenuity, for Aurora herself is meant to embody both “[w]oman and artist” (Book 2, Line 4). As she relates her passion for classical literature in Book 1, Aurora pays homage to poets such as Homer, who famously begins nearly every new book of verse in The Odyssey with an invocation of a “rosy-fingered dawn.” Aurora’s very name thus links her with a poetic heritage tapped by Spenser and Milton before her. Leigh is also a homonym of “lay,” the symbol of the poet laureate, which Barrett Browning almost became. While Aurora reads classic literature in memory of her father, her mother is also figured in poetic terms, as a “Muse” (Book 1, Line 155). From the outset, Barrett Browning heroically inserts herself and her protagonist among the pantheon of great poets and asserts her character’s poetic predestination.
Aurora’s name also pays homage to Barrett Browning’s influential friend, the French novelist George Sand, whose real name was Amantine Lucile Aurore Dupin. A fellow female writer and proponent of women’s rights, Sand’s aesthetics and politics exerted a clear influence on Barrett Browning. In Barrett Browning’s poem “To George Sand: A Recognition,” she enthuses, “True genius, but true woman!” Much as Aurora does Marian, Barrett Browning would exonerate Sand, who publicly adopted male habits, from the societal controversy surrounding her. Sagely aligning her principal character with the traditionally masculine sun, symbol of reason and rightness, Barrett Browning uses Aurora Leigh to mount an attack on the misogyny that ensnared her contemporary female writers, and she also critiques the wider social injustices of her time.
The act of defining her central character as an illuminator aligns Barrett Browning with the Age of Enlightenment, although she is more fully embraced by the Romantic Movement that followed. Enlightenment thinkers privileged reason over the passions, a binary that Aurora’s musings approach in a nuanced way. Aurora’s characteristic rationality therefore sets her apart from the contemporary feminist writer Mary Wollstonecraft, who was critiqued for her excessive displays of emotion. Yet Aurora is also reprimanded for losing her temper when she defends her decision to reject her cousin’s reasonable proposal in favor of pursuing her poetic ambitions instead. If Barrett Browning’s principal character is named after the dawn, it is because she is intended to inaugurate a new Age of Enlightenment that embraces both female artists and spiritual grace. In her devotion and compassion, Aurora is intended as a signal for others to “hold the lamp of human love arm-high” (Book 4, Line 46). Aurora Leigh was indeed received as a controversial firebrand for ethics and justice by its contemporary readers.
If the ambitious Aurora Leigh bears a striking resemblance to Barrett Browning herself, Romney Leigh is a thinly veiled Robert Browning. He is described in Book 1 as being “cold and shy / and absent...tender when he thought of it […] grave betimes, as well as early master of Leigh Hall” (Book 1, Lines 513-16), and this description is designed to express the reality of his childhood freedom, which stands as a sharp contrast to the strictures that bind Aurora despite her relative liberty in an otherwise strict British society. The Leigh cousins therefore stand as foils for one another, for as Aurora herself states, “We came so close, we saw our differences / Too intimately. Always Romney Leigh / Was looking for the worms, I for the gods” (Book 1, Lines 551-52).
While Aurora focuses on traditionally female literary subjects, it is through the character of Romney that Barrett Browning articulates the dominant political and social views of the day. Romney Leigh is a figure who stands for social justice in the poem-novel, and in his dedication to the poor, the disadvantaged, and the meek, he takes on a somewhat Christlike persona despite his sanctimonious statements, many of which clearly annoy Aurora as the years progress. The somewhat ghost-like apparition of Romney throughout the poem, whether he appears in person or merely in Aurora’s thoughts, continually disrupts the rhythm of the female characters’ lives. Whenever Romney physically appears within a scene, his presence serves as a philosophical counterpoint to Aurora’s often radical assertions, and he also functions as an avatar of sorts for the patriarchy, for his considerably conservative views provide a necessary contrast for Aurora’s contemplations and allow Barrett Browning to explicitly critique and condemn the aspects of society that she judges to be so constricting and damaging to women in real life.
Romney Leigh’s appearances and behavior continually shock both the women and the reader throughout the poem, for as he finally admits in Book 9, he does indeed experience a variety of political and social failures over the course of the story. In this regard, his character also serves the practical purpose of injecting new plot developments and creating fresh motivations. Thus, although Aurora Leigh is a remarkably progressive character given the time frame, she is nonetheless relegated to a reactive role within the story, for Romney’s actions often serve as a catalyst for her own decisions. In this aspect of the story, it is clear that even Barrett Browning is still influenced by a certain degree of internalized misogyny, for her protagonist is ultimately dependent upon the actions of a man to realize the highest culmination of her life’s ambition: the pursuit and achievement of love. Yet Romney’s ambiguous status as a love interest also allows the poet to conduct a wider examination of the changes to the prevailing social order that were gradually taking place in Barrett Browning’s day.
Much like Mary Magdalene, Marian is a maligned yet spiritually “pure” woman. It is significant that despite her lowered status after her fall from grace, she comes to live high in a garret just like Aurora, and this transition to a “higher” state of living indicates that although society has cast her down, she nonetheless retains her spiritual stature and morally pure character. During Barrett Browning’s lifetime, abject poverty was often associated with artistic ambitions, and accordingly, lower-class living conditions were often conflated with high art in the Romantic mindset. Ironically, because the most prominent Romantic poets often occupied a privileged place in English society, they had the luxury of portraying poverty itself with a rosy glow that they might find it far more difficult to perceive, were they themselves subject to such poverty.
Within the context of the story, Barrett Browning uses the character of Marian to examine issues of Social Justice in 19th-Century England, for Marian endures many injustices throughout the poem—from Lady Waldemar’s trickery to Marian’s subsequent traumatic experiences with sexual exploitation, rape, and unplanned pregnancy. By portraying a conclusion in which Marian emerges from these traumas with a new sense of dignity and dedication to her son, Barrett Browning asserts that no social scandal can have a permanent effect upon Female Identity and Value in the Victorian Era, regardless of what the paragons of high society might attempt to decree. Beautiful and innocent, Marian is described as Aurora’s “woodland sister” (Book 5, Line 1095), and her name and appearance clearly echo the shepherdess Maid Marian who features (alongside Robin Hood) in earlier English folklore. Marian expresses herself in a simple “rustic” manner (Book 4, Line 151) that contrasts with the pretension of the wealthy and manipulative Lady Waldemar.
In one of the liveliest (and arguably one of the “cattiest”) passages of the poem, Book 3 of Aurora Leigh ironically sketches Lady Waldemar’s supercilious, conciliating, and manipulative character, stating, “She said her name quite simply, as if it meant / Not much indeed, but something” (Book 3, Line 159). Left by her husband while still young, the boastful Lady Waldemar, with her equivocations and exaggerations, is the embodiment of the archetype of the deceptive female. In contrast with the natural meekness of Marian Earle, whom a Christlike Romney attempts to save, Lady Waldemar represents the sycophantic serpent in Eden and is ultimately the unrepentant author of many woes.
Lady Waldemar’s name even suggests that she “mars” the “wald” (German for “woodland”), and in this way, the poet implies that Lady Waldemar exists in opposition to the natural order, which is exemplified by Marian, Aurora’s “woodland sister.” In a sharp contrast with Marian, who is genuinely impacted by inequality, Lady Waldemar hilariously casts herself as a “martyr” despite her eventual machinations to sabotage Romney’s plans to marry Marian. Aurora’s description of Lady Waldemar is therefore justly withering as she states, “this palfrey pranced in harness” (Book 4, Line 698), and thus, the protagonist’s disdain for Lady Waldemar is established early on.
By Elizabeth Barrett Browning