logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Andrzej Sapkowski, Transl. Danusia Stok

Blood of Elves

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1994

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Nature of Monstrosity

Content Warning: This following section contains references to genocide/ethnic cleansing.

The novel does not actually give its reader a clear taxonomy for what “counts” as a monster, but it does distinguish between humans/nonhumans and “monsters.” Elves, dwarves, gnomes, and most other nonhuman races are considered Elder Races, meaning they were present before the Conjunction of the Spheres. After the Conjunction, humans arrived, as well as many other creatures now considered “monsters.” Nonhumans are not considered monstrous per this differentiation, but humans might be. However, as humans quicky became the dominant species, monstrosity is now determined by their attitudes toward other creatures. If humans can engage with something intelligently and without fear, it is less likely to be considered monstrous.

That said, even humans can be “monstrous” to other humans in certain circumstances. Between the novel's first and second chapters is an excerpt from Monstrum, or Description of the Witcher by an anonymous author. The excerpt begins: “Verily, there is nothing so hideous as the monsters, so contrary to nature, known as witchers, for they are the offspring of foul sorcery and devilry” (53). The author of this fictional text positions witchers as being outside humanity because of their “foul practices” and lack of conscience or virtue. The author also calls for Kaer Morhen to be destroyed and the ground where it stood salted so nothing can grow there. Following this is a passage from the fictional Nicodemus de Boot’s Meditations on Life, Happiness and Prosperity, which argues that superstition is intrinsically linked to the eternal stupidity of “common folk.” This placement suggests that Monstrum is a superstitious text, indicating that its assessment of witchers as monsters or monstrous beings is based on ignorance.

The belief that unmodified humanity is the only “true” humanity is what makes witchers “monstrous.” Witchers are modified with mutagens, so they are often considered to be unnatural and suited only for violence. The passage from Monstrum further tethers “nature” to “virtue.” The argument follows a transitive logic: Anything that kills is not virtuous, anything unvirtuous is unnatural, and anything unnatural is monstrous—therefore, anything that kills is a monster. Ironically, a similar interest in the “natural” underpins Ciri’s lessons with the witchers. At Kaer Morhen, Vesemir teaches Ciri how to identify and defeat ghouls. He tells her ghouls are “relicts” from the Conjunction of the Spheres and that killing a ghoul “does not upset the order and interconnections of nature which prevail in our present sphere. In this sphere these monsters are foreign and there is no place for them” (122). In short, ghouls are an invasive species, and their presence disrupts the “natural” order.

Linus Pitt’s debate with Geralt highlights another important aspect of monstrosity—namely, that what people consider a “monster” is usually something they know little about. As Linus says of the aeschna,

It was wiped out a good half-century ago, due—incidentally—to the activity of individuals such as yourself who are prepared to kill anything that does not look instantly right, without forethought, tests, observation or considering its ecological niche (223).

The less humans know about a creature, the more monstrous it appears—but it might actually belong there.

Identity and Belonging

Identity takes several forms in Blood of Elves, intersecting with issues of race, family, and vocation. Ciri is surprised to learn she has an elven name even though she is not an elf. Later, Yennefer identifies Ciri as having elven blood, but “there is not much of it in her” (351), as it likely came from an elven great-grandfather or great-grandmother. Genealogically, Ciri “belongs” to both groups, but socially and culturally she was raised exclusively human. This is not surprising, as one of the elves at Bleobheris says humans persecuted interracial children, which would give royal families in particular a strong incentive to hide the existence of any elven heritage.

The loss of Ciri’s family also complicates the way she thinks about identity. Ciri feels that she began “another life” when she met Geralt, her old life in Cintra “irrevocably wiped out” (378). She views her life in separate stages, discrete moments she can box up and set aside, rather than as a collection of experiences that all form who she is. Ciri blocks out memories of her past because she feels it is permanently gone. She cannot be Princess Cirilla anymore, since her home was destroyed and her family killed. She tries to understand who she is after losing everything she once felt made her who she was. Yennefer’s questions about Ciri’s past evoke memories that demonstrate how much those things still matter: Ciri’s past is real, and she cannot exclude it from her present identity.

Ciri links her identity most strongly to whatever role she fills at that time. She resisted Yennefer’s mentorship because she felt that becoming a magician would mean she could not be a witcher anymore. Ciri is proud of her ties to Kaer Morhen and the witchers, and she finds strength in that role: “I’m not frightened! Pah-pah! I’m a witcher” (386). That said, as she embraces her abilities and grows closer to Yennefer, Ciri does begin to identify more closely with that part of herself: “I’m not just some novice feeding hens for eggs. I am…a wizard” (339).

Ciri’s remark is suggestive in light of the excerpt from The Poisoned Source where Tissaia de Vries asserts that “no one is born a wizard” (329). This statement posits a difference between what someone is born and what they later become. Geralt voices a similar sentiment when he says that being a witcher is not what he chose, but something chosen for him. He was born an ordinary child and became a witcher by someone else’s choice, but he became a father to Ciri of his own volition. Yennefer’s character development also reflects this distinction between being born and becoming, choosing or being chosen. Yennefer had to choose between being a sorceress and being a mother, but by the novel’s end, Yennefer chooses to open herself up to Ciri, allowing herself to feel and have what she never thought possible. Ciri’s presence in Geralt and Yennefer’s lives makes them learn how to become the people they wanted to be but never believed they could. Their family unit makes them feel like they finally belong in the world in a way that aligns with their true selves.

Parental and Familial Relationships

Closely related to the issue of belonging is the nature of family. Geralt and the witchers become Ciri’s family, and they do their best to raise her despite their limited knowledge of girls. Coën, Lambert, and Eskel are like Geralt’s brothers, and Vesemir is like their father. They take care of Ciri because they have to, but they care about her because they want to. In this case, being a family is a choice one makes to include, provide for, and love someone else. Although Geralt often has to figure out fatherhood as he goes along, he resents Philippa’s accusation that he will fail Ciri: “You accused me of being a bad guardian, that I don’t know how to protect the child. I will protect her. As best I can. I will kill. I will kill mercilessly” (328). Similarly, Triss’s love for Ciri allows her to realize that Ciri needs more help than she can give her. Like the witchers, Triss ultimately wants what is best for Ciri, even if she cannot provide it herself, which demonstrates that being family requires selflessness and sometimes sacrifice. Everyone at Kaer Morhen wants Ciri to feel safe, strong, and loved, and they seem aware that one person cannot provide all of those things. The witchers especially empathize with Ciri’s being orphaned and losing her home, fitting their lessons to what Ciri seems to need most—for example, teaching her combat skills so she can defend herself and not feel afraid.

In the novel’s concluding chapter, Yennefer becomes a mother to Ciri despite learning from a young age that motherhood was never a possibility for her: “Each one of us must decide what she wants to be—a wizard or a mother” (329). Ciri first calls Yennefer “Mama” after she has vision of the sorceress tortured in chains, and Yennefer calls Ciri “daughter” while comforting her after an intense vision. While Ciri’s other familial bonds are evident, what she and Yennefer share is the first connection in which both people put their bond into words.

Ciri’s family relationships are also pedagogical relations; each of Ciri’s new “family members” teaches her more about herself and the world around her. The witchers, especially Geralt, teach her self-defense: how to recognize danger, to overcome fear, and to trust in her own strength. Triss teaches Ciri languages but also helps Ciri embrace her femininity by teaching her how to apply makeup and learn about her changing body. Yarpen’s remarks on Triss’s feeling for Geralt show Ciri that much in the same way there are different ways people can be a family, there are also different ways in which people can love one another. Afterwards, Ciri sees Geralt as more than just her protector and father; he is his own individual with his own relationships and feelings. Especially as children mature, familial relationships go both ways, with children learning to extend the same selfless love to their parents as their parents have shown to them.

Racial Tensions Between Humans and Nonhumans

Within the world of the Witcher series, “race” refers not to skin color or ethnic heritage but rather to something like species—specifically, the differences between humans, elves, dwarves, and other humanoid beings. These various races have long and often bloody histories interacting with one another; at the time Blood of Elves takes place, humans are the dominant group, having colonized the territories that once belonged to elves and relegated all nonhuman species to second-class citizenship. At Dandelion’s concert, for example, the crowd is described as being separated by race. However, this scene also establishes that prejudices of any kind are learned behaviors: “Children of elves, dwarves, halflings, gnomes, half-elves, quarter-elves, and toddlers of mysterious provenance neither knew nor recognized racial or social divisions. At least, not yet” (11). This harmonious image contrasts with the debate that unfolds after Dandelion’s last song, during which one human claims Nilfgaardians (the Northern Kingdoms’ enemies) are descended from elven bloodlines—as if this explains the animosity between the two regions. An elf in attendance responds, “[S]how me a human now who hasn’t a dash of Seidhe Ichaer, the blood of the Elder Race” (25). In this conversation, a human blames elves writ large for the actions of other humans, which demonstrates a dangerous ideology rooted in false equivalences.

In point of fact, Nilfgaard is most likely emboldening Scoia’tael commandos with antihuman propaganda. Yarpen Zigrin tells Ciri that Nilfgaardian emissaries support the Scoia’taels in order to sow internal discord among the Northern Kingdoms; they will be too busy fighting amongst themselves to mount a defense against Nilfgaard. However, this propaganda is effective only because of the racism within the Northern Kingdoms. For example, a quotation from Marshal Milan Raupenneck reads, “A good elf is a dead elf” (141). This is a call for genocide and rhetorically follows the same format as the ubiquitous antisemitic and anti-Japanese propaganda of the 1940s. The history that Yarpen teaches Ciri suggests that something of the kind has already occurred; the killing or relocating of any elf who resisted human colonization is analogous to ethnic cleansing.

However, Yarpen’s lessons also complicate the novel’s depiction of relations between nonhuman groups. According to him, gnomes and dwarves were the first races, subjected to the same forceful colonization that their elvish conquerors would later endure from humans: “They—to be accurate—happen to be strangers just as much as you humans […] Now they’re competing with each other to offer us friendship, suddenly we’re all brothers […] Before, their arrows used to whistle past our ears” (174). His statement highlights the apparent hypocrisy of elves, as they use their violent history with humans to justify guerilla warfare (or terrorism, if one is on the receiving end of their efforts) while expecting gnomes and dwarves to ignore the violence elves committed against them. At the same time, the fact that elves in the past might have committed atrocities against other races does not mean that the elves living in the present deserve to suffer similar atrocities. The history Yarpen tells Ciri highlights the fact that there is no such thing as a “perfect” victim.

The racial tensions between humans and nonhumans extend beyond outright violence; these prejudices also bear significant social and cultural consequences. Yarpen argues for what a modern reader may call assimilation: “We have to live next to each other […] Damn it all, it took a hundred years but, somehow or other, we managed to live a common life, next to each other, together” (181). However, the trap set for his caravan indicates that no matter how fervently Yarpen tries to prove his loyalty, humans will never see him as anything other than a potential threat. Yarpen’s realization that his “special mission” was a set-up is particularly devastating because it shows the reader that he truly saw the best in everyone involved. The peaceful coexistence for which Yarpen advocates seems, at this point in time, impossible.

Neutrality, Justice, and War

One of the novel’s most pressing questions is the role of justice in war and whether neutrality perpetuates violence and injustice. An elf at Dandelion’s concert claims that “nothing justifies wide-scale slaughter and sacrifice of life” (20), and Linus Pitt tells Geralt that “nothing can justify the extermination of a species, even a predatory one” (224). Graffiti written on the wall of the Faculty of Law at the University of Oxenfurt offers a different perspective on justice: “If you thirst for justice, hire a witcher” (209). The graffiti implies that human law is incapable of delivering justice to a wronged party or protecting people from being wronged. The graffiti also suggests that witchers exist outside human law and are thus able, through violence, to deliver justice and protection.

Geralt’s own view of justice is part of the lesson he teaches Ciri about neutrality: “To be neutral does not mean to be indifferent or insensitive. You don’t have to kill your feelings. It’s enough to kill hatred within yourself” (197). Geralt protects humans from Scoia’tael just the same as he protects nonhumans from persecution, but he will not enlist in anyone’s army or kill on behalf of anyone’s hatred, even and especially his own. He refuses to pick a side because he believes, like Ciri does, that everyone is equally deserving of protection. This is best exemplified by Geralt’s refusal to fight Scoia’taels on Wenck’s orders: “I have no intention of killing those, as you call them, evil creatures on the order of other creatures whom I do not consider to be any better” (166). Geralt does not believe in taking action based on someone else’s biases. Furthermore, in Geralt’s view, justice is not a matter of who is right but of who is being wronged, and the wronged party is different in every instance of violence.

Triss wants the witchers, especially Geralt, to pick a side. Despite her claim to not recognize “collective responsibility,” Triss advocates for that exact kind of shared guilt. She scolds Geralt and the others for not previously helping the Northern Kingdoms or nonhumans, as if they have to join a cause now in order to atone for not doing so before. However, Triss misunderstands what the witchers mean by “neutrality,” and rather than encouraging them to articulate their beliefs, she reprimands them for not sharing hers.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text