46 pages • 1 hour read
William Least Heat-MoonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Heat-Moon takes a generally negative view of corporatization and commercialism. As he travels the country, he deliberately avoids the interstate system, which he believes symbolizes corporatization. Likewise, he pointedly visits small-town, independently owned restaurants and bars and other business establishments. He does what he can to escape the modern ethos, the trend toward an increasingly cheap and hollow culture that chooses convenience seemingly at all costs. Corporate America’s unrelenting drive for commercial success is a destructive force, and part of Heat-Moon’s project is to show another side of America—the ingenuity, authenticity, and resilience of its people, especially those operating small businesses.
Heat-Moon sees various manifestations of this insidious commercial culture, and his contempt is evident in such statements as: “[M]aybe America should make the national bird a Kentucky Leghorn and put Ronald McDonald on the dollar bill” (16). His aversion to fast-food is obvious, and he eats at small, out-of-the-way establishments, or “where-you-from-buddy” restaurants (17). This is his effort to resist the increasing onslaught of the “franchise system,” which, according to him, has destroyed local character and livelihood around the country. Heat-Moon has thereby staked out a kind of ethical boundary, and even though he is occasionally tempted to eat at a chain restaurant, he refuses on principle.
This anti-commercial ethic lends a sense of purpose to the journey. When he imagines “Ma in her beanery and Pap over his barbeque pit, both still serving food from the same place they did thirty years ago” (17), Heat-Moon is not leveling a quixotic boycott of fast-food; he is drawing attention to the people who have staked their lives on the kinds small businesses under threat from mega-corporations. Far from being exclusive to the fast-food industry, this principle applies to all small business: While convenience is highly prized in the modern age, there is no substitute for individual craft and the sense of community engendered by independently owned businesses. This principle arises repeatedly throughout the book, from the barber in Dime-Box to the maple syrup farmer in Vermont. The narrative draws attention to those displaced by commercial culture, but it also emphasizes the value in supporting individual livelihood rather than franchises.
Much of the author’s enterprise concerns self-discovery. He is not quite sure what he seeks, but he expects to learn much about America and himself. At 38, Heat-Moon begins his journey from a place of uncertainty. He is separated from his wife (whom he refers to only by the nickname “The Cherokee”), and the course he planned for the local community college was canceled, leaving him jobless. As a college instructor, Heat-Moon is an educated individual, and he brings his intellect with him as he traverses the nation. In the text, his intellect finds greatest expression not in his grasp of history, nor in his knowledge of the natural world, but in his openness of mind. He brings the idea of this open-mindedness alive through metaphor when he says, “A traveler who leaves the journey open to the road finds unforeseen things come to shape it” (108). This is the quality that enables Heat-Moon to learn from others who might not otherwise come across as teachers but who nevertheless possess a wisdom exclusive to life experience.
Among these many people, Noel Jones perhaps best exemplifies an intellect grounded in common sense and experience. Jones’s learning throughout his life has been of the pragmatic kind, and during his extended discussion with Heat-Moon, he explains the old methods and labor requirements of curing tobacco. He recalls a story when he was a boy and one of the field-hands passed away from pneumonia. His father brought him to the man’s quarters, and the young Noel witnessed the man thrashing in his bed from the sickness and fever. A life of labor and hardship gave Jones a very practical view of the world, though he is not hardened, nor is he mean-spirited.
Jones’s expressions—such as “nobody ever heard of junk then. Junk’s a modrun invention” (47)—reveal a man who, though world weary, has wisdom exclusive to experience and observation. The contrast between the academic Heat-Moon and the old tobacco farmer Jones shows two ways of learning, and the text intends to fuse these two ways. The author equally values “book smarts” and “street smarts,” and throughout his book, he often oscillates between the two.
Change is inevitable, and the complicated nature of humanity’s relationship with change is a central theme. Heat-Moon witnesses a wide variety of ways in which people respond to a changing world. From the white residents of Selma whose explicit racism exposes their harmful resistance to change, to the Italian immigrant couple in upstate New York whose lives are continuous adaptation and perseverance, the figures of this text struggle against the inevitable sweep of increasingly rapid change.
Heat-Moon states that “[t]he nature of things is resistance to change, while the nature of process is resistance to stasis, yet things and process are one and the line from inorganic to organic and back again is uninterrupted and unbroken” (241). This complex thought represents Heat-Moon’s own complicated relationship to change. His tendency toward nostalgia, evidenced in places such as the Sutton pharmacy, demonstrates his resistance to change. In fact, his simple insistence on staying off the interstate system shows a man stubbornly clinging to a bygone age. The early-21st-century equivalent might be someone refusing to purchase a smartphone, just out of a stubborn refusal to embrace new technology and a new way of doing things.
However, while Heat-Moon can be stubborn, he realizes the pitfalls that await those who cannot accept change. In the above quote (241), he indicates a path forward in which one can change regardless of their reluctance. Life, in this case, is the process of change—and whether or not one accepts it, change will come. The secret for Heat-Moon adaptation methods, and he learns this through interviewing average folks whose stories demonstrate that ability.
The uncertainty of the author’s life is a primary impetus for his journey. The situation with his wife, and the fact that he mentions its details only vaguely and in passing, suggest that things are complicated. Part of what compels the trip is Heat-Moon’s need to escape—but he also has the need for clarity, to strip things down. In Heat-Moon’s own words, “A man who couldn’t make things go right could at least go. He could quit trying to get out of the way of life. Chuck routine. Live the real jeopardy of circumstance” (3). He has a distinct need to pare off life’s frivolity, and throughout his journey, he discovers that the best sort of life is one lived with simplicity.
Two episodes reflecting this theme are Heat-Moon’s visit with the Trappists in Georgia, and his dialectical conversations with the Seventh Day Adventist hitchhiker, Arthur O. Bakke. When he picks up Bakke, he points out that what is most immediately noticeable about the man is his aluminum suitcase. When Heat-Moon discovers that the suitcase contains all of Bakke’s worldly possessions, he says, “I envy your simplicity” (260). Bakke tends to frame most of his comments within Christian scripture, and while Heat-Moon is impervious to such evangelism, he sees Bakke as symbol of ideal simplicity. He remarks to Bakke about the suitcase, “I admire the compression of it. I wish I could reduce it all to a couple of boxes. I like your self-sufficiency” (260). The decisiveness of Bakke’s life path, however religious, impresses Heat-Moon, who can’t ignore the freedom Bakke has made for himself.
Heat-Moon sees similar freedom with the monks in Georgia. The monks’ devotion—which involves solitude and living simply—at first makes the author suspicious. However, as he further discusses with Patrick Duffy, one of the monks, the reasons for joining this monastery, Heat-Moon sees the logic in it. As with Bakke, it is not the religiosity that Heat-Moon finds striking—it is the men’s resolve and their willingness to strip life to its barest foundations. Such simplicity begets liberation. As one of the monks, Father Anthony Delisi, says, “The purpose is freedom—for body and mind. Simplicity is flexible. It endures well. Without so many things around, we have more time” (81). That life is complicated is something Heat-Moon recognizes, but as he travels the country and interacts with such people, he learns that there is an alternative, one that requires resolve to step outside the stream of modern life and view simplicity as a virtue.