logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Ibram X. Kendi

How to Be an Antiracist

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 13-15Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 13 Summary: “Space”

During Kendi’s time at Temple University, the African American studies space in the university was a safe “Black space” (166) for him. In 1987, Temple professor Molefi Kete Asante founded the nation’s first African American studies program. Asante ran the program with Professor Ama Mazama. Kendi deeply admired Mazama and asked her to become his dissertation advisor. Mazama taught Kendi there is no such thing as objectivity, which made Kendi reevaluate his approach to journalism. When he asked what he should do without objectivity to guide his work, she advised him to “[t]ell the truth” (167).

At Temple, many of Kendi’s classmates were also graduates of historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs), which made him very self-conscious about the ways these educational spaces for Black students are commonly disparaged. According to Jason Riley at the Wall Street Journal, HBCUs are falling behind “decent state schools like the University of Texas at Austin, never mind a Stanford or Yale” (171). Kendi maintains this is an unfair comparison as HBCUs do not have the same endowments as historically White schools. When HBCUs are compared to White schools with the same means and makeup, there are actually higher graduation rates for Black students.

Black-centered spaces have been contested throughout history. In 1865, during the Civil War, General William T. Sherman asked 20 Black leaders what Black people needed. They said that they needed land to be free so they “could reap the fruit of [their] labor, take care of [them]selves” (174). Sherman issued Special Field Order No. 15, which reassigned land from Confederate landowners to Black leaders, and consisted of a mule and “not more than forty acres” (174). While the prevailing attitude at the time was that these Black-owned lands could not succeed without White support, by 1865, nearly 40,000 Black people settled on the land before it was taken back by Confederate landowners.

White integrationists often interchangeably use the concepts of separation and segregation. Kendi finds this problematic as “[t]he integrationist strategy expects Black bodies to heal in proximity to Whites who haven’t yet stopped fighting them” (174). He argues that “Separation is not always segregation” (174).

This conflation of separation and segregation began with the Plessy v. Ferguson decision, which justified the purpose of segregation of public facilities so long as they were “separate but equal” (175). During the Brown v. Board of Education case, NAACP lawyer Thurgood Marshall reproduced a social experiment facilitated by Kenneth and Mamie Clark to prove that Black children’s preference for White dolls was a sign of the “negative psychological harm of segregation” (175). The case led to a unanimous landmark decision to integrate public schools. In a statement about the decision, Chief Justice Earl Warren shared the belief that “[s]eparate educational facilities are inherently unequal” (176).

While the integration of schools ended segregation and was celebrated as “racial progress” (178), Martin Luther King Jr. privately feared that integrated schools would preserve racial inequities that could detrimentally impact Black children’s education. He was worried about the domination of White cultures in integrated spaces and how that might affect the way Black children learn. Kendi similarly shares these views, arguing that the issue is not about racial separation but the distribution of resources. For him, the problem is “integrated White spaces that hoard public resources” (177).

In present-day, “the academic-achievement gap” (178) is an idea held by such figures as Cal Berkeley professor David L. Kirp who argues that integrated education is necessary for Black children and that they fare better in integrated schools. The academic-achievement gap points to the different levels of performance between White-integrated schools and Black schools. Kendi believes this metric for assessing performance is already faulty since it primarily relies on standardized testing. Furthermore, White-integrated schools have more opportunities and resources to help improve standardized testing among their student body.

Kendi cautions that the inability to see the value of Black spaces means running the risk of being co-opted by White people in the name of integration: “from the expansion of integrated White spaces to Whites gentrifying all the non-White institutions, associations, and neighborhoods” (179). He insists an antiracist strategy must combine “desegregation with a form of integration and racial solidarity” (180). This means supporting marginalized groups that seek each other out in separate spaces while supporting the wellbeing of all students in integrated spaces with the right resources.

Chapter 14 Summary: “Gender”

Kendi fondly remembers his Black women colleagues at Temple University, Doctors Kaila Story and Yaba Blay, who helped him address his internalized sexism and homophobia. In his upbringing, his family introduced mixed values that both upheld and challenged what Afro-Dutch scholar Philomena Essed called “gendered racism” (188). Kendi acknowledges, “I became a Black patriarch because my parents and the world around me did not strictly raise me to be a Black feminist” (183).

While Kendi describes his mother as a strong woman, his parents still viewed the growing number of Black children being born into single-parent households between the 1970s and the 1980s as an issue. Along with other liberals and conservatives, they blamed these growing numbers on the sexual irresponsibility of Black women and disregard of activist work of the 1960s.

These numbers have more to do with married Black women having fewer children throughout the 20th century. As times change, however, Kendi’s parents’ views eventually evolved to embrace more feminist ideas. In one instance, Kendi’s mother’s early protest of the language of submission in wedding vows set a precedent for equality in her marriage to Kendi’s father. She challenged Christian sexism as well, joining consciousness-raising groups for Christian women.

Kendi writes that Black women’s behavior has always been seen as problematic by conservatives and by Black men. In 1965, President Johnson’s assistant secretary of labor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, published a government report called “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action,” which reported that ¼ of Black families were headed by women, which was twice the rate of White families. This was deemed “a crushing burden on the Negro male” (183). In 1994, the political scientist Charles Murray calculated that 68% of Black children were born into single-parent households, which he blamed on the “welfare system” (184).

Black women’s groups such as the Black Women’s Alliance in 1970 and the National Black Feminist Organization in 1973—along with Black women’s caucuses in Black power and women’s liberation groups—were formed to combat the sexism in Black spaces and racism in women’s spaces. In 1974, several Black women separated from the National Black Feminist Organization to form the Combahee River Collective. Members Barbara Smith, Demita Frazier, and Beverly Smith drafted a statement publicly declaring a platform for queer liberation, feminism, and antiracism, which was not commonly heard of at the time. They wrote, “Our politics initially sprang from the shared belief that Black women are inherently valuable” (187), joining a legacy of Black women publicly declaring their rights, including Sojourner Truth, Ida B. Wells, and Anna Julia Cooper. This statement was part of the anthology The Black Woman edited by Toni Cade Bambara, which included works by other prominent Black women such as Audre Lorde, Nikki Giovanni, and Alice Walker.

Racism and sexism continue to negatively impact Black women. In 1991, Anita Hill accused Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment, highlighting the violence that Black men and White people can inflict upon Black women.

In 1991, UCLA critical race theorist Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw introduced the term “intersectionality” (188) in her article, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color” in the Stanford Law Review. In it, she writes, “Although racism and sexism readily intersect in the lives of real people, they seldom do in feminist and antiracist practices” (188). The concept of intersectionality gave language for other marginalized groups to talk about intersections of racism, sexism, and homophobia.

Kendi proposes that to talk about injustice towards Black women, it is important to consider identifying Black women as a “race-gender” (188) as issues of race and gender cannot be separate for Black women. Black women suffer at the hands of Black men and White people alike. Black women are victims of high sterilization rates by the state. Black and Native women also experience higher poverty levels than any other race-gender group. Further, single White women’s median incomes are significantly higher than single Black women’s incomes.

Gendered racism does not only impact Black women but also White women and Black men. Gendered racism portrays White women as weak, leading to antagonistic attitudes towards strong White women—like Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election. The portrayal of White women as virtuous is also what has historically turned many Black men into the target of rape accusations when they are hypersexualized alongside virginal White women.

Since issues of race and gender entwine, Kendi concludes by stating that to be a feminist is to be an antiracist and vice versa.

Chapter 15 Summary: “Sexuality”

Kendi reflects on his graduate school years where he learned to undo his internalized homophobia. His best friend and colleague, Weckea, is a Black gay man though Kendi did not realize it until his friend Raena informed him. When Kendi found out Weckea was gay, he was surprised his friend did not possess the stereotypical feminine traits he associated with gay men. He realized that to continue to be friends with Weckea, he had to challenge his homophobia. He learned from Kaila and Yaba about “gender being an authentic performance” (195) and opened himself to becoming a better ally to queer and transgender people.

Kendi discusses the long history of homophobia’s connection to racism. British physician Havelock Ellis coined the term “homosexual” and deemed homosexuality a “congenital physiological abnormality” (193). This idea, coupled with 19th century Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso’s criminalization of White homosexuality, has contributed to present-day pathologizing and criminalization of homosexuality. Furthermore, these ideas also assume biological difference or abnormality with queer bodies, which Kendi argues bears similarities to the ways in which non-White bodies are deemed deviant. When it comes to queer Black people, then this sense of abnormality compounds. Additionally, Black transwomen suffer violence on multiple levels for their gender, sexuality, and race.

Kendi feared critique—especially by colleagues he admired like Kaila and Yaba—for his lack of knowledge about gender and sexuality. He is grateful for his queer Black women colleagues who accepted him and encouraged him to undo his internalized ideas about gender, sex, and race. He realizes that “[t]o be queer antiracist is to understand the privileges of my cisgender, of my masculinity, of my heterosexuality, of their intersections” (197).

Chapters 13-15 Analysis

In these chapters, Kendi’s personal narratives center around his time as a graduate student at Temple University where he pursued his degree in Black History. He characterizes his experience in graduate school as a time of deep learning from those around him—particularly from queer people and Black women. He credits Professor Ama Mazama, a Black woman scholar and his dissertation advisor, for transforming the way he thinks about subjectivity and objectivity in social analysis. He also looks to the critiques leveled by his Black women colleagues, Kaila and Yaba. It was his friendship with Weckea that led him to interrogate his own internalized homophobia. While he spent previous chapters examining the ways he has personally been impacted by racism, his discussion of sexism and homophobia in these chapters explores other marginalized identities he does not possess, but to which he feels an obligation to speak. To do so responsibly, he must implicate himself as a “cisgendered Black heterosexual male” (197) and recognize the errors he has made through his internalized racism and sexism.

When Kendi defines the role of a “queer antiracist” he expresses that it means “to understand the privileges of my cisgender, of my masculinity, of my heterosexuality, of their intersections” (197). The concept of intersections is vital to Kendi’s definition of racism as it not only recognizes the different experiences of marginality through racism, it also pays homage to the queer and Black women scholars and activists who coined and developed that concept. As much as being a queer antiracist requires him to pay attention to experiences outside of his understanding of Black identity, it also compels him to reflect on how he benefits from his gender and sexuality in the larger body of Black experiences. To be an ally means he must do the introspective work of understanding his privileges without centering himself and other cisgender, heterosexual Black men when it comes to fighting for a more just society for Black people.

The term “intersectionality,” which is central to these chapters, has grown in prominence in the late 2019s and early 2020s, serving as an easy buzzword to some on the American political left, and a harbinger of doom to some on the American political right. In a 2019 interview with Vox, the coiner of that phrase, Kimberlé Crenshaw, emphasizes that the term is often misinterpreted by those who believe it represents an inversion of the current system, in which traditionally oppressed groups are placed above White, straight, cisgender men on the American hierarchy. Rather, intersectionality calls for a dismantling of that hierarchy altogether, which is in line with Kendi’s interpretation of the term. (Coaston, Jane. “The Intersectionality Wars.” Vox, 28 May 2019, www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/5/20/18542843/intersectionality-conservatism-law-race-gender-discrimination.)

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text