32 pages • 1 hour read
Lorrie MooreA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section includes a quote that uses stigmatized language to refer to disability.
Aside from the narrator, who almost seems like a character herself, Francie is the primary main character in “How to Become a Writer.” She is a dynamic character serving multiple roles in this story. She acts as the main protagonist in the story but can also be seen as a stand-in for the narrator, who tells the story of Francie in second person as if she were speaking to her. In second person, the narrator is also speaking to the reader, and in this story, Francie can also be seen as a story version of the reader who is reading “How to Become a Writer,” to indeed, become a writer.
The engine of the story is entirely driven by Francie’s relationship with writing, and how this connection to her writing hinders her relationships with the humans in her life, like her mother, roommate, and boyfriend.
From the very first paragraph, Francie is shown to be someone who looks to others for affirmation about her writing. When she does not receive this affirmation, she resents the world’s dismissal of her. An early example of this is shown when, as a child, she breaks a glass while washing dishes in retaliation after her mother dismisses her writing. In the next paragraph, on receiving criticism from her English teacher for having little understanding of plot, Francie reverts to calling him names when she writes on her paper, “Plots are for dead people, pore-face” (2). Both of these actions are understandably childish but show that Francie is moving from expressing her feelings physically to expressing them in writing. As the narrative suggests through the development of Francie’s story, the best revenge against those who discourage a writer is to become successful—and lampoon past detractors.
As she continues to receive both praise and criticism of her work, she refuses to listen to her teachers and fellow writing students who encourage her to work on her plotting. Instead, she writes more and more bizarre plotlines. These other students are described only by the questions they ask in class, like “Have you earned this I?” and “Why should we care about this character?” (11). However, the narrator, and Francie, too, is one of these types of people, acknowledging their ineptitudes and pretensions, while claiming to be of their tribe, someone who cares about the elements within a story, like cliches and characters.
Throughout the story, though Francie flirts with the idea of becoming a child psychologist or applying to law school, she never fully gives up writing, instead, devoting herself to what she feels is her purpose in life, despite the solitude, the negative affect on her relationships and its other drawbacks. She has a curious, rich inner life and a love for language, and mines these for her art.
Francie’s mother is a practical woman described as someone who “believes in wearing brown because it hides spots” (1). She is uninterested in her daughter’s writing, and instead, asks her to do chores around the house. It is implied that she and her husband divorce because he is having an affair. She is distracted by her son’s tour in Vietnam, unable to give Francie the attention she wants for her writing. Because of her practicality, though, it is likely she never would have, even without these concerns. About her parents’ marriage and divorce, Francie writes a story in which a married couple accidentally blows themselves up by detonating a land mine in their kitchen.
When Francie’s mother visits later in the story, she still has not given up hope that her daughter will make another career choice. About her writing friends, the narrator says that Francie’s mother would have described them as “a bad crowd.” She notices the circles under Francie’s eyes and gives her a book playfully titled How to Become a Business Executive, in a nod to the story’s title. When Francie responds by telling her mother she wants to be a writer, her mother reminds her that she had once been a child psychology major. This is a theme continued through the story—all the professions Francie might have had if she had not been a writer. At the end of this conversation, the mother seems resolved to the reality of her daughter being a writer, if not happy about it, while keeping hope alive Francie will change her mind. She comments, “Sure you like to write. Of course. Sure you like to write” (31) as if merely humoring her daughter, hoping she will have a change of heart. The mother figure is a voice of pragmatism and criticism and her lack of understanding and support for Francie’s writing highlights Francie’s isolation even inside her own family.
The brother character never appears in an actual scene in the story and never speaks. However, as a topic that Francie struggles to write about, his presence is important. Little is revealed about him other than he is fighting in the Vietnam War at the beginning of the story. In the middle of the story, while Francie is in college, we find out that her brother has come home with only “half a thigh.” His returned, damaged presence haunts the story. When given an assignment in which she must write about her brother’s return from war, she cannot write about it. For the first time, it seems, she has no words.
Later, when contemplating why she writes, Francie cannot help but think: “Why is there war? Or: If there is a God, why is my brother now a cripple?” (14). This discomfort with the unexplained hurtful realities of the world seem to be inherently connected to why it is she writes. Maybe she writes to understand these events, or to ask more questions about them. There is never closure, yet Francie never seems to stop asking questions. In this way, the brother character stands in as a metaphor for the injustices in the world and the bad things that happen to good people.
It is interesting, too, that though Francie cannot write directly about her brother, her writing is filled with the kinds of violence that he must have seen while serving in Vietnam. Multiple explosions occur in her stories, and it is implied that her brother lost his leg in a land mine explosion. His suffering and her attempts to understand it are revealed in her fiction but are cloaked in the outrageous plots of her other characters.
The boyfriend character is the first love interest and is someone who Francie chooses because her story plots are bad, and she wants to start writing comedies. She looks for someone with a good sense of humor, which she tests by creating anagrams of the names of his past girlfriends and putting them into her stories. There are few other details about him throughout the story: he is presented as an anonymous cipher and is only material for her writing.
It is obvious from the beginning of their relationship that he does not mean that much to her and does not truly understand her needs. Francie’s friends, including her roommate, are hoping she will break up with him. They think he is dumb. In the beginning of the story, he stands in as a bit of a stooge type of character, if not a good-natured one. When Francie breaks up with him toward the end of the story, he is not missed because no one seemed to like him anyway.
She then begins to date men who instead of “whispering, ‘I love you,’ shout, ‘Do it to me, baby’” (35). This, the narrator claims, will be good for Francie’s writing. Throughout the story, although she is interested in finding a relationship, Francie continues to settle for less than she deserves. The narrative suggests that writing is not compatible with a settled relationship.
As Francie devotes more and more of her life to writing, she seems to date blander men. The man she is with in the last lines of the story serves as a reminder of the life she chose. Even his face is “blank as a sheet of paper” (41), which echoes the description of Francie’s mother in the first paragraph of the story, whose face is “blank” like a “donut” on reading Francie’s work. Francie’s loneliness and lack of connection with others run from the beginning through to the end of the story.
By Lorrie Moore