23 pages • 46 minutes read
Walt WhitmanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
As the speaker lists the sorrows he sees around him, the first focus for his sorrow is the suffering young men “at anguish with themselves, remorseful after deeds done” (Line 2). Although the poem was published in the 1860 edition of Leaves of Grass, the eve before the Civil War and following years of violence among pro- and anti-slavery settlers streaming to the western lands hoping to extend slavery into the territories, the focus is not on young men caught up in the violence or fighting a battle. Instead, the image is far from any public conflict. The “secret convulsive sobs” suggest men who are suffering alone, “remorseful after deeds done” (Line 2). While the “secret” in Line 2 stays a secret and the reader never learns what the men are suffering from, one can infer that the “secret convulsive sobs” may be from gay men experiencing desire, especially since the 1860 edition contains the “Calamus poems,” a series that was added to the 1860 edition and was controversial for its exploration of love between men:
What scandalized readers in Whitman’s time was his frankness about heterosexual bodies, and his portrayal of women as sexual beings. Only those alert to same sex desire seemed capable of reading a deeper level of scandal in the poems, a ‘secret’—shared in broad daylight but lately unreadable—that was for them more nourishing than any other text of their time (Mark Doty, What is the Grass: Walt Whitman in my Life. W.W. Norton Company, 2021).
The “secret” of gay male desire is not as explicit in this poem as it is in the Calamus poems, but the personal shame the young men feel, for whatever “deed” they have done, suggests the idea that much of the suffering in the world begins at the personal level. The young men face an internal conflict; they are “at anguish with themselves” (Line 2). By starting with this intensely private experience—the suffering within one’s own mind—Whitman shows how devastating personal suffering can be when the war is with one’s self. At the same time, their suffering suggests a war between inner versus outer forces. Society doesn’t agree with these desires (as the criticism underscores), so the young men are also at war with society, a war that mirrors brother versus brother fighting one another in the larger, national war between states.
“I”
“I” is repeated 13 times in this poem. Despite the significant presence of the “I,” the “I” stays at a distance from those that the “I” contemplates. This speaker does not transform into the Other as it does in Whitman’s “The Sleepers”:
I am the actor and the actress, the voter, the politician,
The emigrant and the exile, the criminal that stood in the box,
He who has been famous, and he who shall be famous after today
The stammerer, the well-form’d person, the wasted or feeble person (Whitman, Walt. “The Sleepers.” Academy of American Poets).
Unlike the speaker in the lines above, the speaker in “I Sit and Look Out” does not assume to know the Other’s experience. This lack of knowledge and power creates a static heaviness to the “I,” who is trapped in his perspective, able to do nothing but look out at the suffering he sees but unable to effect change. This is a much diminished “I,” compared to many of the speakers in the earlier editions of Leaves of Grass. The first 1855 edition even included an image of the author dressed in working man’s clothes, showing Whitman’s desire to transform himself and become unified with the working class. But in this 1860 poem, the speaker is unable to achieve such transformation. He can see but cannot embrace the people he loves.
Much of the poem is abstract and universal. Whitman is not specific when he talks about the “battle, pestilence, tyranny” (Line 6). He does not engage in showing versus telling. Likewise, battle or disease imagery cannot overtake the poem. The speaker’s lens stays zoomed out. But then in Line 7, the speaker’s lens zooms in on the sailors. He sees them at sea, starving and “casting lots who shall be kill’d to preserve the lives of the rest” (Lines 7). The scene at sea most likely was not a very common experience for most of Whitman’s readers; the other images are much more common—the suffering mother, the seduced young women, the battle. And yet, the specific nature of the sea scene draws the reader into the action of casting lots. It is one of the rare action moments in the poem. In most of the other lines, the action has already happened, the deeds are “done” (Line 2). But Line 7 takes place mid-action; suspense is high. Who will live? Who will die?
Whitman dramatizes this unusual moment to highlight the capriciousness of life. Whitman implies that his reader is also casting lots. Just like the sailor who could live or die depending on the casting of lots, the reader can easily change places with anyone in the poem. Whitman is a Transcendentalist who sees our common humanity. We are connected to the young men, the mother, the sailors. We too are casting lots, subject to the whims of fate. Whitman believes in our interconnectedness; what happens to one of us happens to all of us. This theme of unity is central for Whitman. He wants to remind his readers of their common American identity during a time when powerful divisions threaten to tear apart the fabric of American society. He urges his readers not to be too quick to dismiss the suffering that occurs at the edges of their experience: One day, that suffering could become the most central thing in their lives.
By Walt Whitman