61 pages • 2 hours read
Italo CalvinoA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In this novel about novels, the power of the written word is evident. Words symbolize the world’s complexity. They can be misunderstood, forgotten, misheard, mistranslated, or lost, all of which can have a devastating effect on the characters. The power of the written word is so evident that the Reader is seduced and obsessed, feeling a compelling urge to finish any novel that he starts. The written word propels the Reader through the novel, from one book to another, from one absurd situation to the next. This movement through literary and physical space represents the inherent power of the written word, tempting the Reader with various potential ways to understand the world but refusing to allow him to understand these complex understandings in a complete way. The Reader is fascinated by the written word because he’s so confused by the actual world. The further he progresses through the text, the more complicated, paranoid, and absurd his reality becomes. He’s sent on secret missions and involved in international conspiracies, all because of his desire to finish a book. He needs to finish the book, just as he needs to understand the world’s complexity; the written word neatly sums up these desires, which is the key to the Reader’s understanding and his catharsis.
During the Reader’s secret mission, he meets with Arkadian Porphyrich. As the Director General of the State Police Archives in Ircania, Porphyrich explains to the Reader that no one “holds the written word in such high esteem as police states do” (235). To police states, the written word symbolizes social control. While the Reader obsesses over words and literature because they offer him an explanation for the world, the authoritarian states the novel portrays have a similar understanding from a different direction. They seek to weaponize and control this obsession, using censorship and control of the written word to alter reality in accordance with their desire for power. To the police states, control over the written word—which they achieve by banning certain books and disseminating others, for example—symbolizes control over the population. By controlling the words people consume and share with one another, the state shapes society in a manner that it believes it can control. The understanding that the Reader seeks is deliberately withheld in a police state, which views the world as simple rather than complex and, as a result, wishes to convey this simplicity through a careful choice of words. To police states, the written word symbolizes a new method of authoritarian control.
In addition, the written word hints at the idea of semiotics. In semiotics, the interplay between the signifier and the signified creates the meaning of words. The signifier is the word itself. The signified refers to the abstract ideas associated with a written word. When a word is translated, for example, the original cultural associations are often difficult to translate. The word itself can be directly translated, but the true meaning of the word—the things the word symbolizes or implies in the original language—is left behind. This is what drives Marana into his translator conspiracy: He simply gives up on translating works because true translations are impossible. Instead, he cynically decides to substitute completely unrelated works. Since he has lost faith in the power of the written word when translated, he begins to believe that translation is impossible. In this sense, the written word again symbolizes the complexity of the untranslatable world.
Throughout If on a winter’s night a traveler, pronouns play a significant role. The way that the novel uses pronouns symbolizes the extent to which it plays with (and rejects) traditional literary expectations. The use of the second-person singular pronoun “you” is an example of this. Rather than using first-person singular (“I”) or third person singular (“he” or “she”), as in most literature, the narrator addresses the audience directly as “you.” This rejection of the traditions of narration and storytelling, right from the very first word of the novel, signifies the extent to which the text defies expectations. In addition, the use of the second-person singular pronoun signifies the author’s desire to explicitly involve the audience in the reading experience. The audience isn’t just reading Italo Calvino’s novel; the audience is directly being told that they’re “reading Italo Calvino’s new novel” (3). The use of “you” as a pronoun and the description of the audience member reading the text symbolizes the novel’s focus on self-awareness and eagerness to defy expectations. The unconventional use of pronouns is as much a direct address to the audience as the pronouns themselves, because the rejection of convention is built into the fundamental grammar of the narration. From the foundation up, If on a winter’s night a traveler shows the audience that the traditions of literature are malleable.
Throughout the novel, the use of the pronoun to address the Reader shifts and changes. In the early main chapters, the narrator first addresses the audience as “you.” Later, however, this address to a theoretical “you” evolves into a more fully-fledged character. The narrator explains that “you” isn’t as vague and abstract as it once was and begins to assign certain demographic qualities to “you,” such as the gender and age of the likely audience member. This alters the effect of the pronoun’s use in the novel; no longer is “you” solely a pronoun: Now it bears a certain degree of social expectation. It now has an identity that it previously lacked. This shift in identity represents the evolution of language and the way in which semiotic theory suggests that words mean more than their simple, signified meaning. The pronoun “you” changes in meaning over the course of the novel as the narrator defines the character via demographic expectations, revealing the biases of the narrator himself as well as those of the literary market at the moment when the novel was written. “You” no longer signifies only the audience reading the novel but also the expectations of the narrator about who might be reading the novel and the Reader’s experience thus far in it. The evolution of the pronoun’s use comes to symbolize the manner in which language can evolve and change.
In addition, the narration of If on a winter’s night a traveler uses the first-person singular pronoun “I.” In addition to the self-aware narration of the main story, each individual story (and Silas Flannery’s diary entries) uses this first-person singular pronoun. The stylistic similarities across the individual stories and the main narration is another instance of recurrence. Just as characters appear and reappear throughout these stories, performing roles and functions according to their archetype of hero, love interest, or antagonist, the narration is subject to the same literary forces. The narrator of each story may not be the same, but they all share similarities, creating a multifaceted, complex, and subjective version of the first-person singular “I,” which recurs across the stories. This use of similar narrators shows that recurrence isn’t limited to characters, but is a foundational element of the novel’s literary intent. The pronoun “I” becomes as universal and as subjective as each of the character archetypes.
Throughout If on a winter’s night a traveler, the characters fear the existence of traps. In both the main chapters and the interjected stories, these traps represent the fear and paranoia that affects the modern mind. However, the traps catch few characters; they don’t even glimpse many traps. Thus, traps are something that exist mostly in the characters’ minds. Amid the paranoia of contemporary society, every situation and every location seems like a potential threat. Nothing can be trusted or even completely comprehended. In this sense, the characters’ fear of traps represents a deeper, more visceral fear of the unknowability of the world.
Rather than fearing actual, physical traps, the characters fear what they don’t know or understand. The subjective reality that surrounds them in the postmodern novel can’t truly be understood in its entirety. The characters can neither understand the full breadth of another person’s character nor comprehend every nuance and subjective perspective of the universe they inhabit. They sense this unknowability on a fundamental level but lack the tools to vocalize their fear, so it manifests as a constant reference to traps. These traps aren’t pits or snares but truths and secrets that are hidden from society. The world itself is a trap that, through its subjective nature, strikes fear into the hearts of the characters. Traps symbolize the paranoid state of the postmodern mind in a literary context, whereby characters in a novel manifest their fears in the form of literary symbols.
By Italo Calvino
Art
View Collection
Beauty
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Books & Literature
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Italian Studies
View Collection
Magical Realism
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection