62 pages • 2 hours read
Candice MillardA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
European interest in the African continent first began with Portuguese explorers in the 15th and 16th centuries. The purpose of this exploration was threefold. First, Portuguese explorers wanted to expand European knowledge of the world and geography. Second, these explorers wanted to find natural resources (e.g. ivory and gold). Finally, these explorers tried to locate a sea route to valuable trade routes in Asia that would evade the taxes and duties collected by the Arab and Ottoman empires. The Portuguese first established ports along the western coast of Africa, which enabled them to restock supplies before continuing to the Indian Ocean. They were also the first to become engaged in the African slave trade. Other European countries soon followed the Portuguese.
Prior to European arrival, slavery did exist on the African continent. However, slavery at this time was more like European serfdom. In addition, slaves could marry, own property, and even purchase other slaves. Slavery also ended after a certain period of servitude or if the owner died. African slavery also did not involve generations of families (i.e., generation after generation of families were not enslaved). African slavery differed drastically from the form of slavery that developed in the Americas and elsewhere. The latter was much more brutal and embedded with racism. The trans-Atlantic slave trade lasted for approximately 400 years. Scholars estimate that between 12 and 15 million Africans were forcibly moved across the Atlantic.
European interest in the African continent ramped up beginning around 1750 and lasted until about 1900, becoming known as the “Scramble for Africa.” European empires competed for power by trying to expand their spheres of influence to other parts of the world. Initially, European empires were slow to conquer the continent, but this all changed once they realized it held a wealth of resources. Europeans used the notion of the White Man’s Burden to justify their conquest of the African people. This concept held that Africans were culturally inferior to Europeans. As a result, Europeans had a responsibility to civilize the African people by conquering them. This racist concept has long since been debunked, but its devasting legacy still reverberates throughout the African continent today.
The second reason is Christianity. Since the Crusades, Europeans had been intolerant of non-Christian religions and ideologies. European explorers, government officials, and the public at the time did not understand the diverse cultures and religions found on the African continent. Rather than trying to learn about them, most Europeans simply viewed these practices as savage and lesser than their own. Europeans used the desire to “civilize” African peoples by converting them to Christianity as another excuse for their conquest and exploitation of the continent and its people.
Commerce represents the final driver of the “Scramble for Africa.” The British abolished the slave trade in 1807, and the slave trade began to decline in the United States in the mid-1800s. However, Western powers still desired economic expansion, especially in light of the Industrial Revolution, which dramatically increased the need for raw materials. Europe turned to the African continent since it had an abundance of raw materials, racing to map the continent to claim territory and exploit resources. Due to the Scramble for Africa, European powers conquered much of the continent. In fact, Liberia and Ethiopia represented the only independent African states by 1914.
The search for the Nile River’s source stems from this European obsession with conquering unchartered territory. Europeans at this time were incredibly interested in ancient Egypt, in part due to the discovery and decipherment of the Rosetta Stone. They became obsessed with wanting to find the source of the Nile River. It became the holy grail of exploration during the 19th century.
Europeans were not the first to obsess about the source of the Nile River’s two main tributaries: the Blue Nile and the White Nile. In fact, this question perplexed rulers, philosophers, explorers, and everyday people for thousands of years, beginning with the ancient Egyptians themselves. Egyptian pharaohs wondered about the source of the Nile, largely because the river was the backbone of their society. Without the silt from the river, Egyptians would not be able to grow food. One pharaoh’s expedition in the 3rd century BC determined the Blue Nile likely originated in the Ethiopian mountains. However, the expedition did not actually reach the source.
James Bruce, a Scottish explorer, claimed that he was the first European to reach the source of the Blue Nile in Ethiopia in 1770. However, it is now widely thought that a Spanish Jesuit priest arrived at the source 150 years earlier. By the 18th century, people agreed the Blue Nile started from Lake Tana in Ethiopia. The Blue Nile provides the majority of the water and sediment found in the Nile River; however, the White Nile is longer. Its origin remained a mystery for longer because its source was farther inland than the Blue Nile.
Initially, expeditions in the 18th and 19th centuries failed to find the source of the White Nile. This situation changed when the Royal Geographic Society shifted the start of expeditions to the eastern coast of Africa in the 19th century. Candice Millard notes that, “this strategy also took advantage of Britain’s burgeoning military and naval strength, allowing the explorers to transport their supplies and equipment by sea to key ports and staging areas such as Aden and the island of Zanzibar” (5).
Despite this shift, the task still remained impossible until Richard Francis Burton, John Hanning Speke, and Sidi Mubarak Bombay undertook their expedition. Together, these three men uncovered the source of the Nile’s headwaters. This discovery, however, took an emotional, psychological, and physical toll on the non-European and European explorers, porters, and guides who were part of the expeditions. Speke and Burton became bitter rivals and Speke might have even shot himself intentionally, resulting in his death.
Time has also muted this accomplishment. Millard notes that while the Nyanza represents the White Nile’s principal source, numerous smaller rivers and streams feed into the lake. A British explorer named Neil McGrigor argued that he made the first full ascent of the Nile from the Mediterranean Sea to Nyanza in 2006, nearly 150 years after Speke’s own expedition to the Nyanza. In addition, McGrigor also circumnavigated the Kagera River, which is the largest river that feeds into the lake and is the most remote headstream of the Nile River. The search for the Nile River’s source thus still captivates explorers and the general public alike today.
By Candice Millard
Action & Adventure
View Collection
African History
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Hate & Anger
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Popular Study Guides
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
The Power & Perils of Fame
View Collection