35 pages • 1 hour read
Daphne du MaurierA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Nat is the protagonist and point-of-view character, yet the narrator offers only brief exposition of Nat’s situation and personality in the story’s opening: Nat’s disposition is “solitary,” and therefore he enjoys working alone on the farm; he has a disability, but the narrator identifies neither its nature nor its origin beyond describing it as a “war-time” disability; and Nat enjoys watching the birds while he eats his lunch alone. This sparse collection of characteristics constitutes the only description of Nat before the narrator adopts his perspective, leaving readers to glean any further details from what Nat sees, hears, and thinks. Nat gradually grows into a round character whose strengths and weaknesses emerge as the story progresses, and whose reliability in the narrative grows stronger with every incident.
Readers know little of Nat’s wartime experience since details about it flit into his thoughts and out again without further explanation from the narrator. One passage, though, holds a few clues: When Nat boards the windows of the cottage for the first time, he remembers “the old days, at the beginning of the war” (72). The next three sentences reveal that he was not married at that time and that he lived in Plymouth, possibly with his mother. He recalls that “he had made all the blackout boards for his mother’s house […]. Made the shelter too” (72). At that moment, he was preparing for a different kind of air raid, so his next thought about those preparations is chilling: “Not that it had been of any use, when the moment came” (72). This sentence hints that the blackout boards and shelter he made for his mother did not work when the bombs fell. Yet there remain unanswered questions about his traumatic experience, for he never thinks of his mother’s house again. He could be avoiding the memory, since his next thoughts are about the Triggs and whether they are boarding their windows.
Nat is the character most awake to reality, but his grasp of reality causes tension; he wants a normal life, yet reality appears increasingly abnormal. This conflict is apparent every time he doubts his intuition. When the birds begin to assemble all over the country, an announcer on the wireless says, “It is thought that the Arctic air stream […] is causing birds to migrate south in immense numbers, and that intense hunger may drive these birds to attack human beings” (71). Nat wants to believe the explanation because it seems plausible, yet his actual experience leaves him doubtful: He knows that the birds’ goal is not survival because so many of them killed themselves in their assault in the children’s bedroom—and when the gulls first attacked him, they mindlessly destroyed their own bodies in the process. Nat thinks he knows what their goal is as the gulls are preparing to descend on the area, but he can only guess the reason. He is always honest, if reticent, in the end.
Mrs. Hocken’s characterization draws entirely from her interactions with Nat. Indeed, her whole narrative existence is defined by her status as Nat’s wife, for she is the only main character without a first name. Nat never says or thinks of her name. He calls her “Mammy” once when he mentions her to the children.
Her lack of a name does not mean that Mrs. Hocken has no personality, however. She is an industrious homemaker, a supportive spouse, and a devoted mother. She shows fortitude when she calmly bandages Johnny and Nat after separate bird assaults. She becomes emotionally vulnerable during the siege, but shows that side of herself only to Nat, whose presence gives her support, if not solace.
Mrs. Hocken is a cautious person, often warning Nat or pleading with him not to take risks, yet she is willing to take risks if it means her family can stay together. When Nat decides to visit the farm to find food, Mrs. Hocken begs, rather dramatically, “Take us with you, […] we can’t stay here alone. I’d rather die than stay here alone” (95). She trusts her husband to protect them, but she is also Nat’s partner throughout the ordeal: She coordinates with him, keeps the children calm with him, and maintains the cottage with him. She also tries to maintain hope; her last lines in the story are about the possibility that America might help the country fight the birds, just as America joined the British in the fight against the fascists in World War II. Her hope, however slight, shows that she fears defeat but is not willing to admit it. Like Nat, she wishes for a normal life, for a world that makes sense.
Mr. and Mrs. Trigg appear briefly in the story, but their contributions to the narrative are valuable. Their dialogue provides context for readers; their personalities contrast distinctly with Nat’s; and their tragic ends supply a source of true horror to the plot.
Mrs. Trigg is a homemaker with a kind manner and an incurious mind. When Nat goes to the farm to ask if the Triggs had any trouble from the birds the night before, Mrs. Trigg “came to the door, beaming, broad, a good-tempered woman” (67); as the narration follows Nat’s point of view, this description of Mrs. Trigg indicates that Nat has a good opinion of his employer’s wife. Mrs. Trigg is friendly and likes to engage in small talk, but because she is a homemaker on a farm in 1950s Cornwall, her conversation focuses on normal, everyday topics. She shows interest in Nat’s opinions and is happy to speculate about the origin of the severe cold weather, but when Nat tells her about his battle with the birds, he can “see from her eyes that she thought his story was the result of a nightmare” (67). In this moment, Mrs. Trigg is almost a reader surrogate, as most readers would likewise find Nat’s story nightmarish—yet she is also a foil to readers, who know his experience was not a dream. Her incredulity, though it is essentially rational, accentuates Nat’s psychological isolation, and her apparent unwillingness to even entertain the possibility of danger creates a mounting sense of dread in the narrative.
Mr. Trigg is a farmer and shows good sense at the beginning of the story when he predicts that a hard winter is coming. However, his sense seems to disappear when he has to confront anything strange and unpredictable. Nat knows this aspect of Mr. Trigg’s character, just as he knows that Mrs. Trigg is uncomfortable thinking about unfamiliar matters. When pondering whether the Triggs will prepare their house for the birds’ assault, Nat sarcastically concludes, “Too easy-going. […] Maybe they’d laugh at the whole thing. Go off to a dance or a whist drive” (72). It turns out he is correct; they will not prepare their house, and they are laughing at the danger flapping toward the farm.
The last time Nat sees Mr. Trigg alive, the farmer’s “cheerful, rubicund face” smiles, and he says, “It looks as though we’re in for some fun” (78). He is not taking the situation seriously—and, retrospectively, his remark holds a morbid irony, as “fun” is not in store for him. He quickly shares the town gossip about the Russians poisoning the birds, but he is more interested in using the gulls for target practice. He is a gentleman farmer, after all, and gentleman farmers take pride in their hunting prowess. Mr. Trigg’s foolhardy self-assurance foreshadows his house’s downfall.
The Triggs’ deaths are tragic because they were inevitable. Their stubborn dismissal of serious concerns warned Nat and the readers that they had doomed themselves. Nevertheless, there is a sense of shock when Nat discovers the corpses. The Triggs died indoors, all the windows in their house smashed in. Mr. Trigg’s body is by the telephone, suggesting the farmer finally realized the seriousness of the situation and tried to call the exchange for help. Mrs. Trigg’s body lies upstairs in a bedroom doorway, a broken umbrella beside her. Readers can deduce that she was using the umbrella in a useless attempt to defend herself. Nat does not linger over them and does not tell his wife the truth about their fates. His dispassionate behavior might indicate that he is focused on surviving the birds’ war, so there is no time to mourn the people who refused to take him seriously.
There are very few descriptive details about Jill and Johnny Hocken. Readers first learn of the children’s existence when the birds attack the cottage on the night that the east wind brings the winter. The narrator says, “Suddenly a frightened cry came from the room across the passage where the children slept,” and Mrs. Hocken says that the cry came from Jill (62). As the story continues, the narrator divulges more information about the children from Nat’s perspective: There are two children altogether, Jill and “young Johnny.” The readers must guess the children’s ages based on how well they speak, whether they attend school, and how they each react to the birds.
Jill is the older of the two children. She speaks in complete sentences and goes to school. When Nat walks her to the bus-stop, the narrator refers to her as Nat’s “small daughter,” who “seemed to have forgotten her experience of the night before,” when the birds burst through her bedroom window and tried to hurt her and Johnny (66). All these details indicate that Jill is probably seven or eight years old; she is old enough to attend school and speak clearly, yet her size is small, and she possesses the mind of a child who is not mature enough to feel anxious about the past.
Jill is sensitive and caring, qualities that reveal themselves when she interacts with her little brother. She shows outrage over the birds’ attempt to scratch Johnny’s eyes, and she follows Johnny’s example when he innocently orders the birds attacking the cottage to “stop it” as he “[points] to the windows with his spoon” (91). Jill also feels responsible for Johnny’s development. At the end of “The Birds,” when the family is eating food that they had salvaged from Mr. Trigg’s farm, a “piece of dripping ran down young Johnny’s chin and fell on to the table” (99). Jill takes it upon herself to say to him, “Manners, Johnny, […] you should learn to wipe your mouth” (99).
Johnny’s speech, the way he eats, and the fact that he does not attend school indicate that the boy is a toddler, between the ages of two and four. His personality is not well-defined because he does not speak much or do much, but his presence in the plot is important. He is the second person, after Nat, to experience an injury from the birds, and he is the most vulnerable character due to his size. When the birds try to scratch Johnny’s eyes during their first assault on the cottage, Nat and the readers gain two vital pieces of information about the enemy: One, the birds are ruthless and will kill any human, no matter how young; and two, the birds aim for the eyes of their prey to incapacitate them.
By Daphne du Maurier