38 pages • 1 hour read
Michael Bungay StanierA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Bungay Stanier distinguishes between being truly helpful and satisfying an urge to save someone. He cites work on the paradox of being helpful conducted by psychologist Edgar Schein, which suggests that people act “helpful” to elevate their own status. This leads to a discussion of the “Drama Triangle,” a term Bungay Stanier uses to describe three archetypes in relationships: Victim, Persecutor, and Rescuer. The Victim exhibits a “poor me” outlook, the Persecutor believes they are “surrounded by fools,” and the Rescuer seizes opportunities to “fix” problems. Bungay Stanier attributes these archetypes to a branch of psychotherapy known as Transactional Analysis, developed by Stephen Karpman, MD. He goes on to explain the hallmarks of these archetypes, from core beliefs to the benefits and price of playing each role. These archetypes do not define people; rather, they define behaviors sometimes employed or reverted to in stressful situations. Bungay Stanier illustrates how a person can cycle between these archetypes, presenting a mock conversation between himself and a staff member in which both people shift between roles. He maintains that while people can move between these types, they tend to have a default role. The Drama Triangle is a fact of human nature, and the sooner one recognizes when they fall into one of these modes, the sooner they can condition themselves to avoid falling into this mode. As for managers, they are often the Rescuer archetype, who feel the urge to save their employees.
In order to avoid falling into the Rescuer archetype, one should ask “How can I help?” The question forces the recipient to articulate their request, and it prevents the questioner from overstepping. Bungay Stanier mentions variations of “How can I help?” like “What do you want from me?” and stresses tone as critical, as one should not make the recipient feel defensive. Asking variations can be sequential, guiding a person toward answering their own question, thereby stifling the need to become their rescuer.
In the workbook section, Bungay Stanier asks the reader to imagine scenarios where they are likely to jump in and rescue someone. For example, people often play the rescuer due to a sense of urgency. However, Bungay Stanier recommends asking “How can I help?” as a means of breaking this habit. The “From the Box of Crayons Lab” section shows how this question is used in a medical setting. When doctors use general questions and resist jumping in, their patients generally provide more detailed information regarding their ailments.
Whenever one asks a question, one should genuinely listen to the answer. Bungay Stanier recognizes that while the other person is talking, one may become distracted or anticipate their own response. One should learn to block these intrusions and truly listen.
Bungay Stanier anticipates skepticism from the reader. He directly addresses the reader and says, “You’re a good person, and you’re doing your very best to let your people thrive. You want to ‘add value’ and be useful. You like to feel that you’re contributing” (135). This quote draws the reader into a dialogue, and Bungay Stanier uses it to highlight the instinctive response of a coach. Generally speaking, most people who provide coaching do want their coached to consider them helpful. Bungay Stanier then pivots and implies “helpful” might not be truly helpful: “Your good intentions often end up contributing to a relentless cycle of exhaustion, frustration and, ironically, reduced impact” (135). As a coaching technique, this quote could seem counterintuitive, yet Bungay Stanier makes the case that a coach can in fact do too much. Rushing to fulfill requests or solve problems is not only ineffective, but also steals opportunities for true collaboration. Like previous sections, this section warns against codependency. An effective coach is able to limit scenarios where codependency can arise and show restraint.
Furthermore, Bungay Stanier introduces the Drama Triangle, a concept informed by Transactional Analysis: “The Drama Triangle starts by assuming that, at least some of the time, we’re playing less-than-fantastic versions of ourselves with most of the people with whom we interact […] Victim, Persecutor and Rescuer” (136). Bungay Stanier clarifies that these are roles are not fixed traits. Often, when managers rush to fulfill requests or solve problems, they inadvertently fall into the role of rescuer. As far as Coaching Techniques are concerned, rescuing is counterproductive, as “helpful” intentions often give way to codependency. Bungay Stanier’s advice to coaches is to learn to say “no” and recognize triggers that cause them to lapse into the rescuer role; saying “no” sets boundaries and gives “yes” meaning. Many managers will say “yes” to requests for a variety of reasons, including maintaining the status quo. Anticipating that some readers are prone to saying “yes” to keep the peace, Bungay Stanier argues the question “How can I help?” creates time and space for a manager to refrain from rushing. Finally, as part of Fostering Meaningful Conversations, a manager should learn to listen to answers, genuinely and sincerely.