logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Jeff Goodell

The Heat Will Kill You First: Life and Death on a Scorched Planet

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 3-5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 3 Summary: “Heat Islands”

Urban areas amplify heat through the urban heat island effect, where materials like asphalt and concrete absorb and reemit heat, causing city temperatures to remain high even at night. Phoenix, Arizona, can be up to 20 degrees hotter than surrounding areas, and cities like New York experience similar effects. This phenomenon intensifies the dangers posed by rising global temperatures. Experts warn of a scenario similar to Hurricane Katrina but caused by extreme heat. A blackout triggered by factors like wildfires, infrastructure failure, or cyberattacks could lead to thousands of deaths.

Urban heat disproportionately affects the poor and vulnerable. In Chennai, India, a woman named Anjalai and her family struggle with daily heat exposure, lacking adequate cooling in their small hut. Her husband faces health risks working in construction under the relentless sun. Rapid urbanization has led to environmental degradation in Chennai, worsening heat and water scarcity. Displaced residents are relocated to poorly designed housing projects that lack basic amenities and increase their heat exposure.

In Phoenix, similar disparities exist. Those experiencing homelessness suffer directly from extreme heat, with limited access to cooling centers or resources. Programs attempt to mitigate these effects by distributing water and essentials, but socioeconomic factors compound the risks. As cities grow and temperatures rise due to climate change, the sustainability of urban life is threatened, especially for the vulnerable.

Chapter 4 Summary: “Life on the Run”

As global temperatures rise, many species are migrating to adapt. Terrestrial animals are moving about 20 kilometers per decade, and marine species even faster. Examples include Atlantic cod shifting northward by 100 miles per decade, frogs and fungi ascending mountains, and trees in the eastern US moving north and west. However, not all species can adapt effectively; Arctic birds like thick-billed murres overheat due to their dark feathers, and Pacific salmon face lethal “migration barriers” when water temperatures rise above 70 degrees Fahrenheit, affecting their reproduction. Some species, like pine bark beetles, thrive in warmer conditions, resulting in massive infestations that destroy forests and create feedback loops that worsen climate change through increased wildfires and carbon emissions.

Historically, people have migrated rather than adapted when faced with severe environmental changes, such as during the Dust Bowl. Today, climate change is causing mass migrations globally, with droughts and floods displacing millions in regions like Southeast Asia, the African Sahel, and Pakistan. These movements have significant political ramifications, fueling xenophobia and right-wing politics. Paradoxically, many Americans are moving toward areas with high climate risks, such as Texas and Arizona, often underestimating the challenges posed by extreme heat.

The Devil’s Highway in the Sonoran Desert serves as a perilous route where extreme heat acts as a deadly barrier for migrants crossing into the US. John Orlowski of No More Deaths leaves water and supplies for migrants along this route. Orlowski explains that US Border Patrol tactics, such as “dusting” with helicopters and funneling migrants into the most dangerous areas, compound the harsh desert conditions, which have resulted in over 9,000 deaths from dehydration and heat exhaustion.

Chapter 5 Summary: “Anatomy of a Crime Scene”

Heat is the vibration of molecules; the faster they move, the hotter the substance. Historically, theories about heat evolved from the ancient Greeks’ four elements to the caloric theory, which posited heat as an invisible fluid contained within substances. In the late 18th century, Count Rumford debunked the caloric theory by demonstrating that mechanical work could generate heat indefinitely. His experiments led to the first and second laws of thermodynamics, establishing that heat is a form of energy resulting from molecular motion.

Early climate researchers like Eunice Newton Foote and Svante Arrhenius recognized the greenhouse effect but underestimated its potential impact, often viewing a warmer climate as beneficial. In 1988, NASA scientist James Hansen testified before Congress, asserting that the greenhouse effect was already increasing the likelihood of extreme events like heat waves. Initially, the scientific consensus held that while climate change could alter the probability of such events, attributing any specific occurrence to it was impossible.

This perspective shifted with the emergence of extreme event attribution science. After witnessing severe flooding near his home in 2003, Myles Allen collaborated with Peter Stott to analyze the European heat wave of that year; they concluded that human influence had at least doubled its likelihood. This marked the birth of extreme event attribution.

Friederike Otto joined Allen’s team at the University of Oxford and became an important figure in advancing this field. She conducted studies on various extreme events, refining methods to determine the influence of climate change on their occurrence. Otto believed that it was important to deliver timely analyses to inform public understanding and policy, leading to the establishment of World Weather Attribution. Her team’s rapid assessments have linked numerous extreme events directly to human-induced climate change, providing concrete evidence of its immediate impacts.

Predicting future heat waves remains challenging due to complex atmospheric dynamics, such as changes in the jet stream influenced by disproportionate Arctic warming. Scientists acknowledge uncertainties in how hot it can get and where extreme heat waves might strike next. However, they agree that continued greenhouse gas emissions will lead to higher extremes and more frequent, severe heat waves.

Otto’s work has profound implications for legal accountability and justice. If specific extreme events can be attributed to human actions, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, it becomes possible to hold major polluters liable for damages.

Chapters 3-5 Analysis

Goodell uses Phoenix—a city with which his presumed American readers are likely familiar—both to introduce and personalize his claims about the Inadequacy of Current Responses to Extreme Heat. As he explains, urban environments are especially vulnerable to the pressures of rising temperatures. Phoenix’s dependency on air conditioning transforms a luxury into a necessity as temperatures climb past 120 degrees Fahrenheit​, yet Goodell highlights the precariousness of this technological reliance, as the hotter it gets, the more power people use. The more power that people use, the more likely it is that the grid will crash. This paradox reveals the limits of current infrastructure in managing extreme temperatures, as rising energy demand risks causing severe power outages. This feedback loop demonstrates the unsustainable nature of depending on technology to combat climate effects. Moreover, Goodell’s focus on this paradox reveals a broader limitation of current adaptation strategies; as urban centers grow more dependent on technology for survival, the environmental impact of these systems feeds back into the climate crisis, intensifying the very conditions they seek to alleviate.

Phoenix also serves as a case study in Socioeconomic Inequality in Climate Resilience. Goodell uses Leonor Juarez’s experience to show the daily struggle faced by those with limited financial means. Juarez lives in a small, poorly insulated apartment where the intense desert heat penetrates her home, forcing her to “feed [the power meter] like a jukebox” to keep her air conditioning running for short stretches (78). This “cooling rationing” is emblematic of the brutal choices poorer residents must make—between paying for electricity or enduring unbearable heat. 

Juarez’s struggle to afford consistent cooling contrasts with the experience of wealthier Phoenix residents, who have insulated homes and constant air conditioning. Insulated homes, shaded lawns, and energy-efficient cooling systems create a bubble of safety for those who can afford it. By cataloging the amenities accessible to wealthier residents, Goodell underscores the disparity in heat resilience—what he calls a “two-tiered system of climate survival” in which those with financial means can adapt to or escape from extreme heat, while the less fortunate are left to bear its full force or succumb to it.

Having grounded his claims with reference to the US, Goodell then broadens his discussion. Anjalai’s story in Chennai illustrates that in regions with even less infrastructure, the impact of economic disparity on heat resilience is more pronounced still. She must navigate Chennai’s hot, concrete streets on her bike daily, exposing her to hours of direct sunlight without any reprieve. In Chennai’s poorer neighborhoods, where residents are packed into dense, concrete structures that trap heat, there is little access to public cooling centers or even shade. This lack of infrastructure places an impossible burden on low-income residents, who often work outdoors in direct sunlight for long hours and return to homes that provide no relief. Goodell again details the amenities available to wealthier residents, who typically do not experience the same stress about power usage, to indicate the disparity in heat resilience.

In Chapter 5, Goodell shifts to a more scientific and historical analysis, providing insight into how human understanding of heat has evolved. This places the current crisis in the context of humanity’s longstanding relationship with heat, explaining that while humans have learned to harness heat for industrial purposes, we have not fully understood or respected its dangers. This historical background reminds the reader that heat is something that human civilization has always had to contend with and serves as a foundation to pivot back to the modern-day challenges posed by heat as Goodell explains how the basic principles of thermodynamics underpin the extreme heat conditions of today. This scientific framework allows Goodell to connect the everyday experiences of people like Juarez in Phoenix to the larger, inescapable forces of nature. Indeed, this is the thrust of his discussion of extreme event attribution, which bridges the gap between the individual and the global, tying particular climate-related events to particular actors in a way that serves Goodell’s overall aim of personalizing the climate crisis.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Jeff Goodell