logo

85 pages 2 hours read

Moises Kaufman

The Laramie Project

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 2001

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Themes

The Violent Effects of Homophobia

Matthew Shepard’s murder was a hate crime. He was killed because he was gay in a society that does not tolerate homosexuality. As a result, The Laramie Project is fundamentally concerned with prejudice, which includes but is not limited to homophobia. Marge Murray tells us, early in Act I, that there is a class problem in Laramie; that there is a divide between those who work at the university and those who work at minimum wage service jobs. Indeed, her own children had been taunted because she worked in a bar. The initial impressions recorded by members of the Tectonic Theatre Company when they arrive in Laramie also suggest the prejudices that exist in America’s urban centers—like New York—about its rural states—such as Wyoming. Such prejudices expose points of difference, of tension between rural and urban society, between rich and poor. However, the most significant difference investigated in this play is that between the heterosexual majority and the homosexual minority, and the terrible, deadly consequences of homophobia.

Many heterosexual people in Laramie don’t consider homophobia to be a problem in their society. They know that gay people exist, they may even know gay people personally, and they do not consider them to be threatened or particularly threatening. Others, however, think that homosexuality is a sin; rather than a legitimate identity, these people consider homosexuality to be a “lifestyle,” something that gay people choose to indulge in. While the theatre company doesn’t attempt to challenge or investigate the justifications behind homophobia, they often center on the fact that homosexuality forces people to consider sex and desire outside of a conventional framework of marriage and children. Within the logic of homophobia, this framework provides sex with a function beyond mere pleasure and intimacy; because homosexual sex cannot produce children, it is not considered valuable to society, and neither are gay people. Furthermore, gay people—like the “queens” that Doc O’Connor refers to—often dress and act in ways that challenge established gender roles, undermining what some people to be their “natural” social place or identity. These tend to be the same people who describe gay people as a homogenous group who conspired to make Matthew’s death into something it wasn’t: a hate crime.

Attempts to deny that homophobia motivated the attack on Matthew also sought to deflect or defer the conversation about homophobia and prejudice that Matthew’s death made so urgent. While Laramie became a focal point for this discussion in the wake of the attack, it had national, if not global, significance. The LGBT people the theatre company interviews in Laramie provide a very different account of what life is like for a gay person in a small town than their heterosexual counterparts. They speak of living cautiously, of hiding their identity from friends and acquaintances, of internalizing the homophobia that characterizes their society. Jonas Slonaker wonders if society would be changed if all young LGBT people stayed in the small towns where they grew up, rather than moving to big cities, where they can be anonymous and open. However, he also acknowledges the difficulty and the danger they would face in doing so. The interviews with Slonaker, Catherine Connolly, Zackie Salmon and others suggest that though some LGBT people might not experience physical violence, the threat of violence is never far away. There is also the discursive violence Father Roger Schmit alludes to; the violence of derogatory language and of the belief that LGBT people are somehow lesser than heterosexuals.

The murder of Matthew Shepard was an extreme expression of the latent homophobia that pervades American society. The desire to have his death categorized as a hate crime was also a desire to name homophobia for what it is so that the difficult process of eradicating it could begin. The Laramie Project offers some hope that this is possible in characters such as Jedadiah Schultz and Rob DeBree who are both deeply moved by Matthew Shepard’s death and have their views on homosexuality changed. 

Religion and Tolerance

Religion plays a huge part in the lives of Laramie residents and the diversity of religious beliefs is evinced by the different religious leaders the theatre company interviews. For many, religion justifies their disapproval of homosexuality. In their eyes, it is a sin. This is certainly the case with the Baptist Minister, who shows such an astounding lack of compassion for Matthew Shepard, and for Reverend Fred Phelps, who stages a protest at Matthew’s funeral. For these men, the transgressive and sinful nature of Matthew’s homosexuality outweighs the tragedy of his murder.

However, the picture of religion drawn by The Laramie Project is more complex than that. The Catholic Priest, Father Roger Schmit, for example, held a vigil for Matthew despite the fact that the Catholic Church does not condone homosexuality any more than does the Baptist Church. While the Mormon Leader spoke of the “boundaries” (35) God has set for us, Father Schmit refused to even consult his Bishop before hosting the vigil for Matthew, because “what is correct is correct.” For this priest, killing a young man because of his sexual orientation was a far greater sin than homosexuality could ever be. Father Schmit’s attitude shows us that faith can be flexible and that religious belief does not preclude the possibility of tolerance, even acceptance of, LGBT people.

The Tension Between Spreading Public Awareness and Maintaining Privacy

One of the interviewees’ most frequent complaints throughout the play is the way the media treated the story of Matthew Shepard’s death and its portrayal of Laramie. Many residents were discomfited by the media attention and the suggestion that Laramie must be an exceptionally homophobic place for such a thing to happen. As a result, some people rejected the idea that there was anything significant about Matthew’s death and claimed that it was just a robbery. Laramie residents didn’t want to have to reflect on their collective identity and their attitudes to LGBT people. Many felt harassed by reporters—even local reporter Tiffany Edwards described some of her colleagues as predators—and resented the way that a local tragedy had become fodder for national and international news.

Part of the desire to control the meaning of Matthew’s death stemmed from a desire to be allowed to mourn privately. That is, the media attention turned the attack on Matthew and his subsequent death into an abstract event whose meaning lay in attitudes to LGBT people; for many Laramie residents, especially the Shepard family, Matthew’s death represented the loss of a friend, a member of the community. The tension between the private need to come to terms with what happened and grieve, and the wider public’s demand for information and investigation into the crime, is at work throughout The Laramie Project.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text