59 pages • 1 hour read
Hilary MantelA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The author portrays Thomas Cromwell as the mirror image of both the king and the country. This implies that he is both a reflection of England and an inverted representation of it. On the one hand, Cromwell symbolizes the essence of the English character—stoic and principled, logical and loyal. Early in the book, he is described as such: “Thomas Cromwell is now fifty years old. The same small quick eyes, the same thickset imperturbable body; the same schedules. He is at home wherever he wakes [...][wherever] Henry happens to be” (13). Cromwell is intelligent and sturdy, welcomed throughout the realm via his attachment to the king. On the other hand, Cromwell signifies the usurper, the commoner who does not quite belong in the illustrious circles in which he finds himself, and who might not actually belong solely to England at all. As Cromwell himself is aware, his rivals “[n]o doubt assume Thomas Cromwell can be cancelled too, reduced to the clerk he used to be: a useful man for getting money in, but dispensable, a slave that you trample as you stride up the stairway to glory” (18). Occurring so early in the book, this observation is prophetic.
Further, Cromwell operates as a liminal figure; he is not purely of England, having honed his skills battling for other nations, working and learning overseas. The fact that he is a polyglot marks him as an outsider; knowing languages beyond those of the established court—French and Latin—puts one under suspicion of foreign sympathy. When Cromwell reflects upon his past, he remembers his time in France, Florence, Antwerp, and beyond. Those he served elsewhere noticed that “[h]e is not as other Englishmen [...] does not brawl in the street, does not spit like a devil, carries a knife but keeps it in his coat” (57). His common origins also keep him from joining the highest echelons of the English aristocracy with whom he mingles: “Not all his craft and guile can make him a Howard, or a Cheney or a Fitzwilliam, a Stanley or even a Seymour: not even in an emergency” (263). Thus, while Cromwell represents and reflects the crown under which he serves, he is set apart from it, both by his background and by his nature.
Even at the moment he is compelled outward to the scaffold where he will meet his end, Cromwell is marked as an outsider. The day is magnificently bright, an atypical English day, and that is out of order for an execution: “An Englishman dies drenched, in the rain that has enwrapped him all his life. Then he lurks about his old haunts in the drizzle and mist, so you cannot be sure whether he is quick or dead” (750). Cromwell is executed in the bright light of day, and the above truism about how an Englishman dies implies he is not a true Englishman. When rumors spread about his deeds earlier in the book, he is also rendered a chameleon: “The further he travels from London, the stranger Cromwell gets. In Essex he is a scheming swindler, a blasphemer and renegade Jew. Spread him east to Lincoln and he is notorious for his knowledge of poisons. In the dales of Yorkshire, he is a magus” (276). The metaphorical Cromwell is a shape-shifter, an inveterate traveler who “has been everywhere” (276). He is even rendered a kind of epic hero, compared to the crafty Greek who wandered far from the shores of home: “And I [Cromwell] like wandering Odysseus, salt-hardened, befogged, making my long way home to a house full of raucous strangers” (427). The implication is that Cromwell is a stranger in England, ever a wanderer from foreign shores.
By the same token, however, Cromwell is often conflated with the king, the perfect mirror image of the realm. When Jane Seymour dies, Cromwell thinks, “[I]f Jane had married me, she would be alive now; I would have managed it better” (445). These are treasonous thoughts, but they are the thoughts of someone who considers himself the king’s equal—or, at the least, an extension of the king. As they work together late into the night, “he allows his body to confuse with that of Henry, so that their arms, lying contiguous, lose their form and become cloudy like thaw water” (394), intermingled physically and intellectually. Further, Cromwell picks up a limp as the king’s leg wound grows worse. He also acquires the habit—heretofore rarely seen in his long narrative over the course of three books—of speaking in the first person when relaying the triumphs of the kingdom: “Seven years I have stood at his elbow while he sets a course. I found him in low water [...] I filled his treasury, made his coinage sound; I packed off his old wife and got him a new one of his own choosing” (462, emphasis added). Later, he notes, “no one can help. It’s just Henry and Cromwell, Cromwell and Henry” (513). It is as if the two are interchangeable, and Cromwell takes full credit for the workings of the crown.
Thus, if as Cromwell asserts, “Your Majesty is the only prince. The mirror and the light of other kings” (467), then Cromwell himself is also the mirror that reflects the realm (darkly) and the light that represents the true way. In executing Cromwell for treason, the author suggests, King Henry extinguishes his own noble light.
It may be argued that King Henry is the light—and Cromwell is either a conflation with or an imperfect reflection of that light—but what the light represents is both complicated and contradictory. Light is associated with purity and truth; Henry leads the way, morally and literally, for his people. However, light also represents the revelation of religious or spiritual belief—as in “seeing the light”—which is debated with much heated contention throughout the long period of Tudor reign. Light also frequently signifies the exposure of treason and treachery, as unflattering facts “come to light.”
For example, when Cromwell is interrogating Margaret Pole, the mother of the rebellious Reginald Pole who allies himself with the Pope against Henry, she stands “[s]tock-still against the window’s light” as the actions of her son are revealed. Later, when Cromwell dines with Eustache Chapuys, the ambassador to the Holy Roman Empire, their repast is overseen by “[a] shaft of light [that] makes its way over the fallen snow, picking a path to the year ahead” (335). This foreshadows—shadows being the inverse mirror images of light—Chapuys’s treacherous dealings against Cromwell, spreading the rumors that he intends to marry Lady Mary, and presages the Pope’s bull of excommunication against the king.
The light also illuminates the divine doings of martyrs and saints. When Cromwell’s daughter tells him of William Tyndale’s fate, Cromwell reflects upon the martyred translator of the Bible: “Now Tyndale has put on the armour of light. On the last day he will rise in a silver mist, with the broken and the burned, men and women remaking themselves from the ash pile” (372). The element of revelation—the revealing of divine truth—will eventually prevail, “but till then we see through a glass darkly, not face to face” (372). Even Jane, in dying for the security of the realm, is cast in a sainted light. When the king reflects on his time with her, he notes that “[t]hose were brighter days. [...] The sunshine, where did that go?” (661). It could be argued that the king here enters a period of darkness, from which Cromwell, his double, never emerges. As Cromwell is later taken to the Tower, “[t]he flint sparkles like sunlight on the sea” (693), but he will be plunged into further darkness.
Thus, Henry’s claim to the light—of moral authority and enlightened leadership—is ultimately called into question. After he has the alleged heretic Robert Lambert burned, Cromwell acknowledges to archbishop Cranmer, “If the king can burn this man he can burn us” (529). He then must write a letter to the English ambassador, the Emperor, and the Pope explaining the deed: “He thinks of adding, our monarch wore white. Head to toe he shone. Like a mirror. Like a light. He writes, I wish the princes of Europe could have seen it heard it—with what gravity he strove for the conversion of this poor wretch” (530). He continues, “they would have seen him as—he lifts his pen for an instant from the page—the mirror and light of all other kings and princes in Christendom” (530). Yet Cromwell does not believe this propaganda for an instant and justifiably fears for his own future: “If Henry is the mirror, he is the pale actor who sheds no lustre of his own, but spins in a reflected light. If the light moves he is gone” (530).
And so it comes to pass: Henry is moved by the wagging tongues of those dissatisfied with Cromwell’s rise from humble beginnings to power and influence. As the final, brutal blows of the axe are delivered, Cromwell feels himself dying: “He is far from England now, far from these islands, from the waters salt and fresh. [...] He feels for an opening, blinded, looking for a door: tracking the light along the wall” (753). In his final moments, Cromwell is again a protagonist set apart—“far from England”—and elevated into the light, as Henry in contrast oversees one of his darkest deeds. Ultimately, the image is one of conflicted martyrdom, as Cromwell is blinded in the moment at which he most needs to see.
Through the long Tudor reign, from the victory in 1485 on the battlefield at Bosworth to the death of Elizabeth I in 1603, an idea of England is being formed. Just as Cromwell is a liminal figure, so does the England of the book emerge as occupying a liminal space and time, in between its mythical past and its imperial future. The intermediate time of the Tudors—marked by a cataclysmic toppling of the religious order, followed by social unrest and reorganization—establishes codified notions of what it means to be English, as well as what England itself is destined to be, for better or for worse. The contentious obsession over the order of succession revealed in the book is no accident: The Wars of the Roses wherein the Plantagenet dynasty dissolved into fighting factions did not decisively settle matters, as the young Tudor upstart, King Henry VIII’s father, reigned victorious. Many of the losing parties felt that the elevation of the Tudors would eventually be the downfall of the kingdom. Thus, the book also concerns itself with the condition of England, what it is, and who defines it.
Early in the novel, England’s mythical past and rarified status are invoked: “For this is England, a happy country, a land of miracles, where stones underfoot are nuggets of gold and the brooks flow with claret” (23). Any king of such a country must be blessed and elevated by God; thus, Henry has no need of a Pope: “I need just a word, to justify how and why I am head of my own church” (84). Further, the king is a conduit between God and his people, as well as between the mythologized past and the aggrandized future; he bears both the burdens of history and the potential greatness of the future. As Cromwell acknowledges, “the dreams of kings are not the dreams of other men” (85). Cromwell also relays the king’s exact thoughts: “And all these, the souls of England, cry to me, the king tells him, to me and every king: each king carries the crimes of other kings, and the need for restitution rolls forward down through the years” (86). This is why “nothing in this kingdom counts so much as how your forefathers behaved on the field at Bosworth,” the decisive battle of the Wars of the Roses (290). Henry literally embodies that history and emboldens its future. After the incident wherein Henry nearly dies after falling from his horse, he is revived not merely by Cromwell’s desperate interventions but also by his divine destiny: “Alive again, he looked at England. He saw her dark valleys and green fields, her broad silver waters, her nightingale woods. He saw her just laws, her free people, he heard their prayers” (473). The king is the vessel through which the fortune of England ebbs and flows.
Therefore, the king must act decisively to restore peace and unity to the realm. He will snuff out the rebellion and “will no longer countenance subversion to his rule, or the existence of men who lie awake in their plush curtained lodgings and dream of Rome” (601). The England of the past—where King Arthur is “exempt from death” (601) like Christ—must be “repainted, re-enamelled, bleached, [and] scrubbed clean” of Catholic idolatry (602). The idea of England that Henry holds—that Cromwell shares—is “a vision of what England could be. You imagine the city of London in the days when prophets walk its streets, when angels cluster on gable ends; you look up as you leave your house, hearing their strong wingbeats in the air” (392). Their England, with the monarch as the one and only ruler, sans Emperor and sans Pope, is a blessed one, a preordained one, and a divinely sanctioned one.
Yet bringing this vision to fruition comes not without its trials, as Cromwell will come to know bitterly and fatally. He wonders as he thinks of inheritance: “Can you make a new England? You can write a new story” (610). However, he continues:
You can write on England, but what was written before keeps shining through. [. . .] It’s not just the saints and martyrs who claim the country, it’s those who came before them: the dwarves dug into the ditches, the sprites who sing in the breeze, the demons bricked into culverts and buried under bridges, the bones under your floor. You cannot tax them or count them. They have lasted ten thousand years and ten thousand before that (610).
England carries with it the beliefs and superstitions, the myths and martyrs, and the many kings and many more commoners of the past even as it moves into the future. Cromwell will not survive the journey, saddled as he is by a past that does not pass the inheritance test, but the future of the realm will not be impeded. When Henry weds his new bride from Germany, he shows her a play of “Britannia unconquered” (639), reminding her—and everyone else—that “Kings of Britain have conquered Rome” (640). Thus, it shall come to pass that King Henry will conquer Rome again, taking England away from the Holy Roman Empire and into its own glory. Ironically, it will be left to his daughter, Elizabeth I, borne of a maliciously maligned queen to realize fully that vision.
By Hilary Mantel