44 pages • 1 hour read
Andrew ClementsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Nora isn’t ready to face people yet, so she fakes a sickness and stays home, watching episodes on The Learning Channel all morning. The phone rings, and Nora tries to sound sick when she answers. The caller is Mrs. Hackney, who asks in a frenzied tone if her parents are home. Nora gives Mrs. Hackney her mom’s cell phone number, and the principal ends the call before Nora can say good-bye. Ten minutes later, Mom bursts through the front door and tells Nora that they’re going to school. Nora tries to deflect, but Mom doesn’t take questions. In the car, Nora learns that all her classmates got a zero on Mrs. Noyes’s quiz, and she realizes that when she didn’t answer Stephen’s phone calls, he took the plan’s next phase into his own hands.
Nora and her mom arrive at a meeting with even more people than the last one, including Stephen and his parents, Merton Lake and his parents, and the school superintendent, Mrs. Tersom. First, Mrs. Noyes explains how all but two students received zeroes on that day’s quiz (excluding, ostensibly, Merton Lake). Nora tries taking the fall for Stephen, but Mrs. Hackney presents incriminating evidence: a flier calling for all students to fail their next test, signed by Stephen. Additionally, Stephen and Merton had a physical “skirmish” that morning. Mrs. Hackney and Mrs. Tersom are prepared to handle the situation as quickly and effectively as possible. Mrs. Tersom addresses the room: “Every student in our schools must always try to do his or her best to earn excellent scores. That’s what education is all about—excellence” (151). As the meeting continues, Nora’s classmates sit locked in the library, distanced from the other students, until the administrators make an action plan. Mrs. Hackney’s first step is a two-week suspension for both Nora and Stephen.
Mrs. Byrne comes to their defense, arguing that while they didn’t make the wisest decisions, they have noble intentions, and they don’t deserve suspension. Describing unhealthy mindsets surrounding the CMT scores, Mrs. Byrne says, “Nora has experienced these issues firsthand, and she’s intelligent enough to have noticed the problems, and she and Stephen have been brave enough to try to do something about it—braver than some of the rest of us have been” (154-155). After finishing her speech, the room is silent before everyone erupts in chatter. Mrs. Hackney finally quiets everyone after several attempts, and Nora has a new idea—one that feels different from the others. She raises her hand, and then she politely requests to speak to her classmates before Mrs. Hackney distributes punishments; after she speaks, she will accept any consequences handed to her. Stephen also asks to address the class, and the adults agree to this arrangement.
Unlike most assemblies, students in the whole-class meeting aren’t restless and snickering. Nora thinks, “It felt like a funeral—my funeral” (162), and Nora questions whether Stephen will help her resolve the situation or incite further rebellion. Mrs. Hackney gives Nora the floor, but nerves choke her words, and Stephen steps in to help her gain momentum. Nora admits that she was wrong to expect big changes in a short amount of time, and she regrets making grades into a joke. She never intended to undermine the importance of education; she only wanted to show that grades and scores don’t mean everything. Finally, she apologizes for the way she chose to act. Stephen speaks after her, admitting that he became too excited when Nora suggested that his grades didn’t matter so much, and he abused that enthusiasm.
To Nora’s surprise, Mrs. Hackney ends the meeting after Nora and Stephen speak. With Nora and her parents, Mrs. Hackney raises the matter of Nora’s transfer to the gifted program. Even though she just narrowly avoided suspension, she resists this change. She doesn’t want to reach her “full potential” the way the adults urge her to; instead, she wants normalcy: “What if what I really want is to be normal? […] I want to use my intelligence the way I want to use it” (168). The adults are silent. When Nora asks if she can go to lunch, Mom dismisses her.
After school, Nora thanks Mrs. Byrne and asks about the best universities for library science. Mrs. Byrne laughs, but Nora’s question is sincere. On the bus ride home, Stephen asks Nora if she went through all that trouble for his sake. She says yes, but she also did it for herself. They only have a short conversation, but Nora reflects on how their simple exchange embodies the normal life that she’s always wanted.
Mrs. Tersom, the school district’s superintendent, believes in quick and decisive discipline, embodying the notion of adult control and standardization that Clements explores in the story. In the meeting, she cites incidents that occurred in the junior high the year before: “It took more than eight months to get that vandalism completely stopped. Why did it take so long? […] because the principal of that school did not jump on that problem soon enough—or hard enough” (151). Therefore, Mrs. Tersom decides to suspend Nora and Stephen as an example to the other students, enacting the same kind of preference for standardized processes over individual development that Nora’s actions were intended to critique. The administration supports the idea that compliance best keeps the children safe and leads to their success, especially regarding reckless and boundary-pushing behaviors. However, as before, Mrs. Byrne advocates for Nora, insisting that she conceived her plan—unlike the instance of vandalism—with noble intentions: Nora is “intelligent enough to have noticed the problems” (154), and she and Stephen are “brave enough to try to do something about it” (154-155). Mrs. Tersom now faces a dilemma; though compliance is the easiest way to reestablish business as usual and uphold the school’s standards, a righteous rebellion could make her an antagonist. Nora deduces, “If she took too strong a stand, she might have a real rebellion on her hands. And if she took too weak a stand, then she would lose some of her authority” (157). Mrs. Tersom’s uncertainty gives Nora and her supporters a foothold to make their case and truly be heard by people who can institute real, lasting changes.
Nora finally understands Mrs. Byrne’s advice to look for the “next good thing” when she conceives a different kind of idea than she’s had before (136). Instead of feeling an idea blasting into her as before, she experiences a calm sense of clarity when she realizes what she should do next. Nora explains, “I could see it had always been there. And the path was for me. All I had to do was the next good thing” (159). This serves as a key moment in Nora’s character development; the quality of her ideas changes from being sensational to considerate, and she soon discovers that the latter yields much better results for both herself and the people around her.
At the end of the day—after all her scheming and high-minded philosophizing—Nora just wants a normal life for herself. Here, the emphasized theme of desiring the ordinary correlates with the narrative’s falling action as the big meeting’s excitement subsides. Nora tells her parents and Mrs. Hackney, “I want to stay in the normal classes because I like normal kids. I don’t want special treatment, and I don’t want teachers who are always trying to push me ahead” (168). Even though Nora accepts and enjoys her intelligence, she simply wants to have a place among her peers and friends; in choosing normalcy, Nora chooses belonging and community. She continues, “I don’t want to get pushed ahead so that I’m always trying to do what someone else thinks a person with my intelligence ought to be doing. I want to use my intelligence the way I want to use it” (168). By choosing community over social pressure and perceived potential, Nora also practices a high degree of agency over her life, choosing a path for herself and accepting the results and responsibilities that arise from it. Nora has managed to stay true to her belief that grades do not represent a person’s intelligence or value while also deepening her understanding of the qualities that do contribute to a person’s character.
By Andrew Clements