logo

73 pages 2 hours read

Albert Camus

The Stranger

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1942

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Part 2, Chapters 1-3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2, Chapter 1 Summary

Meursault is arrested and questioned by the police. He speaks to increasingly important people until he admits to a magistrate that he does not yet have a lawyer. The magistrate reveals that a lawyer will be appointed for Meursault, even if Meursault believes that the case is “very simple” (50). Despite the seriousness of the crime, Meursault is unconcerned. He views the successive interviews as a game and must remind himself that he killed a man.

The next day Meursault meets his lawyer. The lawyer believes that Meursault has “every prospect” (51) of escaping punishment, particularly given his mother’s recent death. However, the police investigated the matter and found that Meursault showed “great callousness” (51) at his mother’s funeral. The lawyer asks Meursault whether he was struck by the emotion of his mother’s death, but Meursault admits that he has, in recent years, struggled to express his emotions. He believes that his physical state dictates his emotions, though he cannot admit to any great feelings of grief.

The lawyer leaves, and Meursault regrets that he did not do enough to convince the man that he is “just like everybody else” (52). Meursault is taken to the magistrate’s office again. His lawyer is not present, but Meursault agrees to answer questions anyway. During the interview, the magistrate takes great interest in Meursault. After Meursault describes the murder again, the magistrate says he would like to help, but he fidgets while Meursault struggles to explain why he shot a prone man so many times. The magistrate excitedly takes a crucifix from a filing cabinet and asks Meursault about the pause between the first shot and those that followed. The conversation switches to religion, and Meursault admits that he does not believe in God. The magistrate is shocked and brandishes the crucifix in Meursault’s face, begging God to forgive Meursault. Growing weary of the conversation, Meursault nods along. However, his words fail to convince the magistrate, who slumps back in his chair.

Finally, the magistrate asks Meursault if he has any regrets about the murder. Meursault admits to some kind of “vexation” (56) that he cannot quite explain. The interview ends. Over the next 11 months, Meursault is dragged before the magistrate many times, but these talks are limited to technical issues handled by the lawyer or repetitions of earlier questions. God is never mentioned again, so Meursault feels at ease during the interviews. He almost begins to enjoy the process, even though the magistrate refers to him as “Mr. Antichrist” (57).

Part 2, Chapter 2 Summary

At first, Meursault is reluctant to discuss his time in jail. He admits that the first few days were particularly difficult. In a crowded jail cell, he confesses to a group of Algerian Arabs that he murdered someone just like them. Though the men are wary of him at first, they teach him how to use his sleeping mat. Later, he is placed in a cell on his own. Sometime after, the monotony of his life is broken up by Marie’s first and only visit. Their meeting is awkward, but she insists that he must remain hopeful. Once he is freed, she says, they will get married and go swimming together. Throughout the conversation, however, Meursault is more interested in the other prisoners. Sometime later, Meursault receives a letter from Marie explaining that she is not allowed to visit him because she is not his wife.

Meursault misses his old life of smoking cigarettes and swimming in the sea, but he soon settles into the rhythm of prison. He reminds himself that there are “others in the world worse off” (61), an idea his mother impressed on him in his youth. Meursault confides in the chief jailer that he mostly misses “the desire for a woman” (61). The jailer says this is true of most people. Meursault befriends the jailer, who remarks that Meursault is smarter than most prisoners. Meursault also suffers from not being allowed to smoke cigarettes, but he eventually adjusts. The only persistent problem is boredom, so Meursault relentlessly explores his own memories.

Sleeping passes a lot of time in the cell. When he is awake, Meursault ponders his memories and the story of the Czech. The story of the Czech comes from a scrap of newspaper found on the underside of the cell mattress. The incomplete newspaper story tells of a man from Czechoslovakia who makes a fortune abroad and then returns to his small village with his wife and child, wearing a disguise to surprise his family. The Czech man’s family fail to recognize him and, noticing the money in his pocket, they kill him during the night. The man’s wife discovers his true identity and the family kill themselves. Meursault reads the story over and over. Between long periods of sleep, the memories, and the newspaper story, Meursault passes the time.

Part 2, Chapter 3 Summary

Another summer arrives and Meursault’s trial begins. The lawyer believes that the trial will last a few days as the court has more important issues to deal with. Meursault is taken from the prison to the court. He admits that he is not nervous but quite interested to witness a trial first hand. Meursault studies the jury in the hot, stuffy courtroom. He is surprised by the amount of people present, but a policeman explains that the newspapers have drummed up interest in the case. Even the newspapers in Paris have taken an interest in Meursault’s case, though they are more interested in another trial that will take place afterward, in which someone is accused of killing their parent.

The trial begins. Meursault struggles to keep up with the administrative procedures, but he is surprised by some of the names on the witness list, including Sintes, Masson, Salamano, and Marie. The list even includes Celeste and the “quaint little woman” (68) from the restaurant whom Meursault tried to follow one night. The judge explains to the audience that he expects an orderly trial.

Meursault is examined in the court, answering many of the same questions asked by the magistrate. The judge asks why Meursault sent his mother to live in a retirement home. The prosecutor changes the subject to the murder and, once he is finished, the court takes a break. Meursault is taken back to the prison, fed lunch, and then taken back to the court before he figures out what is happening. The courtroom becomes even hotter and stuffier, and Meursault feels the audience’s eyes lingering upon him. When the trial begins again, the warden of the retirement home gives a statement. He says that Meursault seems uninterested in his mother’s death. The warden points out that Meursault could not remember his mother’s age. The prosecutor seems satisfied. Meursault realizes that many people in the room hate him.

More witnesses give evidence that Meursault did not show any emotion at his mother’s funeral. Meursault begins to understand that he is “guilty” (71). Celeste provides a defense of Meursault’s character but is cut short by the judge. Marie is questioned. At first, she refuses to divulge intimate details of her relationship with Meursault, but the prosecutor insists. The prosecutor informs the court that, on the day after his mother’s funeral, all Meursault could think about was sex and entertainment. Marie bursts into tears and tries to argue with him. She is led away. Masson and Salamano give statements but they are largely ignored.

Sintes is the final witness. He explains the complicated backstory between himself and his mistress’s brother, insisting that Meursault’s presence on the beach was a “pure coincidence” (75). The prosecutor disputes this idea of chance and, by forcing Sintes to describe his profession as a pimp, turns the jury against the witness. The prosecutor suggests that Meursault was acting out “some sordid vendetta in the underworld of prostitutes and pimps” (76). He insists that there is a link between Meursault’s moral character and the murder. Meursault’s behavior at his mother’s funeral shows, in the prosecutor’s opinion, that Meursault is “a criminal at heart” (77). Meursault’s lawyer shrugs, and the court rises to consider the case. Meursault is taken back to prison.

Part 2, Chapters 1-3 Analysis

Meursault experiences the bureaucracy of the state when he is held in prison ahead of his murder trial. None of the people he meets have a name, and they are all referred to by their job title. The magistrate, the lawyer, the judge, and the jailer are less fully-formed characters than representations of the society that seeks to judge Meursault. They are defined by their jobs and their roles in the bureaucracy, so every interaction is an opportunity for Meursault to navigate the various nuances of a society he views as vapid and meaningless. The characters introduced in the Part 2 illustrate how Meursault is not being tried for murder so much as he is being tried for failing to live by the expectations of society. The representatives of this society become the people who hold the power of life and death over him.

Meursault’s apathy represents a threat to society. The magistrate is particularly incensed when he learns about Meursault’s atheism. Meursault does not believe in God or religion, so the magistrate waves a crucifix in Meursault’s face and refers to him as the Antichrist. Meursault’s refusal to believe in God angers the magistrate because it suggests that Meursault refuses to believe in the society that was built on a Christian framework. Meursault rejects the foundation of the society, and he rejects the ordered view of the world that religion represents. The magistrate believes that society is an expression of Christian virtue, and Meursault, by rejecting Christianity, rejects the virtues of society. The characters like the magistrate cannot conceive of a world in which apathy and detachment are logical, viable responses to existence. As a result, they seek to punish Meursault.

Despite the best efforts of the other characters, Meursault remains indifferent to his existence. Even life in prison does not affect him too much, nor does it force him to reckon with his past sins or regrets. Meursault explains his life in prison in largely practical terms. He cannot smoke, he cannot swim, and he cannot enjoy the company of a woman, so his favorite pastimes are not available to him. Meursault is not attached to anything, so he learns to live without women and cigarettes. He is not even that attached to his life, so he embraces the justice system as a welcome distraction. He attends the meetings with his lawyer and remarks on the sensible, convenient way in which the case seems to proceed. Even though the magistrate accuses him of being a threat to society, Meursault enjoys their discussions. The bureaucracy is a threat to Meursault, and he faces the possibility of a death sentence, but he views every person he meets as a benign distraction from boredom rather than an adversary who has the power to have him killed.

However, Meursault slowly becomes aware of his predicament. He realizes that he has been talking to himself and that the person in his reflection may also go away if he is sentenced to death. The interaction between Meursault and his reflection illustrates a growing self-awareness. He spends more and more time in his memories and in the half-assembled story of the Czech man as he tries to apply a purpose or a meaning to his life. Existence becomes like the newspaper article, in which Meursault attempts to assemble a coherent narrative from the scraps of information he has available. However, Meursault can never know the true story just as he can never truly understand life. Attempting to do so is absurd and impossible. Eventually, the so-called rational representatives of the state will intervene and sentence Meursault to death, much like the Czech man is killed by his own family. All social ties, such as a family, a legal system, or a religion, are hollow, absurd creations that cannot contain or fully describe the absurd nature of the universe.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text