53 pages • 1 hour read
Charles FishmanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The Wal-Mart effect is how Charles Fishman defines Wal-Mart’s large-scale impact on the US and global economies, the global supply chain, and consumers’ understandings of the retail market. The Wal-Mart effect takes many forms, but in an overarching sense it refers to “a transformation of retailing, of pricing, of where and how products are manufactured” (xiv), and of how consumers understand how much general merchandise should cost. Fishman cites various examples of the Wal-Mart effect throughout the text in order to convey the scale and reach of this singular corporate entity. In the case of Wal-Mart’s suppliers, Wal-Mart controls the manufacturing, quality, pricing, and distribution of their products. In the case of Wal-Mart’s competitors, Wal-Mart dictates how much goods cost, if these costs change, and where these goods are available. In the case of Wal-Mart’s customers, Wal-Mart controls where communities shop, the products they buy, and the prices they pay. These are just three examples of the Wal-Mart effect and the ways in which the corporation’s policies have had a profound impact on all entities and individuals associated with them.
Action Alley is the term given to the large aisles that divide Wal-Mart stores and supercenters. These wide central pathways are “considered prime selling space” (67), and they are lined with pallets of products that feature “deals, often on seasonal merchandise” (67). Instead of stocking the products on shelves, Wal-Mart leaves them on their shipping pallets and tacks signage to the product itself. This model began in the early 1990s and emerged from Wal-Mart’s relationship with Sara Lee, an underwear company. Fishman observes that Action Alley is a way for Wal-Mart to feature statement products and to stack them high and sell them cheap without accruing labor costs.
Wal-Mart is an example of a monopsony. The term refers to a retail market in which there is only one primary buyer. Fishman argues that Wal-Mart is “such a large buyer” that it holds price-control power (83). Wal-Mart internally values low prices and is committed to offering consistently low-cost consumer goods. However, their internal devotion to low prices impacts the rest of the retail market, as competitors cannot rival Wal-Mart’s unprecedented price points. According to Fishman, a monopsony is equivalent to a monopoly and an example of “a parallel economic concept” (83).
Makin Bacon is one of the countless products that Wal-Mart supplies. Makin Bacon was invented by Jonathan Fleck and his daughter Abbey in 1992. The item is a special dish designed to cook bacon efficiently and without mess in a microwave oven. Fishman uses the Makin Bacon product and Fleck’s work to supply the product to Wal-Mart as an example of a positive supplier experience. Fleck initially put off working with Wal-Mart so as not to compromise his concurrent relationship with Armour, the meat company who was offering Makin Bacon coupons on its bacon packaging. In 1994, he signed a contract with Wal-Mart after the Armour program closed out. Wal-Mart offered to sell the product for $6.97, a price it has maintained throughout Fleck’s relationship with the corporation. Wal-Mart’s decision not to lower the price of Makin Bacon dishes remains a mystery to Fleck, and is thus an anomalous example of Wal-Mart’s relationships with its suppliers. According to Fleck, the Makin Bacon and Wal-Mart dynamic is both “a perfect miniature of the Wal-Mart effect” and “a fairy tale” (55, 56).
Snapper is an outdoor lawn maintenance company formerly run by Jim Wier. Snapper once supplied Wal-Mart with lawn mowers, snowblowers, and other lawn care equipment. Shortly after Simplicity bought Snapper, Wal-Mart demanded that the company lower its prices. Wier immediately recognized that doing so would require him to sacrifice the quality of Snapper products. Disinterested in compromising Snapper’s ideals, Wier made the bold decision to stop supplying to Wal-Mart, a decision that “instantly cut Snapper’s sales by almost 20 percent” (117). Wier foresaw this result, but didn’t back down when Wal-Mart representatives tried to convince him to maintain his contract. He valued the production of high-quality lawn equipment and a positive workplace environment more than he did his sales. As with Fleck and Makin Bacon’s story, Fishman cites Wier and Snapper’s story as another anomalous supplier experience. Unlike other Wal-Mart suppliers, Wier put Snapper’s well-being and future before his account with the multi-billion dollar corporation.
By Charles Fishman