logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Sarah M. Broom

The Yellow House

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Broken Promises and Unfulfilled Dreams of New Orleans East

The book opens in New Orleans East, which was once a swampy ecosystem full of cypress trees. Despite its inhospitality to settlement, the people who bought the land believed everything could be drained. The 1960s were “dreaming days” (84) when NASA’s facilities in New Orleans East made the city part of the effort to put a man on the moon. As the city expanded, opportunities seemed endless. This was before “white flight, civil rights, the oil bust, subsidence, before tourism would become the main economic engine and codependent” (262). The dream suggested that developers and planners could win the fight against geography and that expansion and growth would continue and lift people out of poverty. Hurricane Betsy and Hurricane Katrina prove the fallacy at the heart of this dream, for “the dream would not, could not hold, because the foundation was bad” (105).

Similarly, the yellow shotgun house is a promise of future prosperity that never comes to fruition—another dream. Ivory Mae’s attraction to the Yellow House was “nothing resembling love; it was more like dreaming” (394). Ivory Mae is attracted to the potential of the house and to the autonomy and security that home ownership promised. Dreaming carries a heavy weight, however. Broom writes:

We knew what dreams cost; we had been doing it—dreaming and paying—all of our lives. My private school cost us lights and home repairs and food on the table sometimes. Unrealized dreams could pummel you, if you weren’t careful (215).

Another dream is the fund they set up for “S*A*V*E: Mom’s House Plan” (215). This unrealized “load-bearing dream” only reminds them of their poverty. Ivory Mae’s obsession with the Road Home program is a reflection of how owning her own home is critical to her dream. Broom writes, “the American dream was a moving target that had to be chased down” (93), revealing the ways that it remained out of reach to most people.

What Maps Leave Out About a Person’s Home and Community

Broom’s book opens with a quote from the Jamaican poet Kei Miller who writes, “draw me a map of what you see then I will draw a map of what you never see and guess me whose map will be bigger than whose?” (17). Broom is interested in New Orleans as a place. Maps are only one way a place is constructed. Maps impose order on spaces to make them legible. To look at a map of New Orleans is to situate it in space. It is insufficient to describe New Orleans as one square mile consisting of “fifteen parallel, seven intersecting [streets], seventy-eight square blocks” (393). This small area is mapped and “nothing in this district is without an accompanying story, and there is no shortage of supporting evidence—anecdotal or otherwise” (393). Broom is interested in the places at the edges of the map, as her family home is literally left of the map. After Hurricane Katrina, the Yellow House and most of Eastern New Orleans are literally removed from the map.

While New Orleans East doesn’t fit into the mythology of New Orleans as it’s packaged and sold to tourists, Broom’s family does its own form of place-making. The importance of place and foundation is most literally expressed in the Yellow House. Simon adds new sections onto it to accommodate the expanding family. Years later after Katrina, Carl watches over the property like a sentinel. They are a family who make homes everywhere they go. This involves the physical space of a house and also community building. Broom writes that Amelia found a home with “these women, who lived in close proximity, composed a home. They were the real place—more real than the City of New Orleans—where Amelia resided” (32). The women in the family “love interiors” (109). Amelia, Ivory Mae, and Broom all create warm, welcoming spaces. However, the chaos of the Yellow House, a chaos compounded by poverty and unstable foundations, leads Ivory Mae and her kids to keep other people away out of shame. Broom writes that “by not inviting people in, we were going against our natures” (199). The complex links between home, place-making, and map-making are woven throughout the text.

The Relationship Between Memory, Myth, and History

Memory, myth, and history are prominent themes in The Yellow House. For example, the mythology of New Orleans is narrated through a selective reading of its history. This is a mythology of a “good time; that its citizens are the happiest people alive, willing to smile, dance, cook, and entertain for you; that it is a progressive city open to whimsy and change” (429). Broom cannot locate her family’s experience in this history. The history of New Orleans doesn’t belong to them. She writes that this mythology “can sometimes suffocate the people who live and suffer under the place’s burden, burying them within layers and layers of signifiers, making it impossible to truly get at what is dysfunctional about the city” (429). It is a history for tourists that erases the challenging experiences of its citizens. Her New Orleans has:

ongoing corruption, a failing criminal justice and health system, poverty, education, and lack of economic possibilities that create for the average local the life-and-death nature of life lived in the city. A city where being held up while getting out of your car is the norm, where many children graduate from school without knowing how to spell, where neglected communities exist everywhere, sometimes a stone’s throw from overabundance (430).

Broom looks for evidence to ground her experiences in truer narratives than those offered by myth. She asks, “When you come from a mythologized place, as I do, who are you in that story?” (393). To answer this question, she consults public records, history books, photographs, and other archives, but she finds only fragments and absences. Instead, she turns to her family and interviews them, creating her own social history of New Orleans East. In doing so, Broom argues that the experience of her family is significant and that there are no peripheral or minor histories, just histories that have been overlooked. Often, the histories that aren’t written down are histories of Black and other marginalized communities. In this context, community memory is a significant tool of remembering. Broom writes a counter-history of New Orleans that shines a light onto things that are hidden.

When Broom tells her brother Simon about this book, he is worries that this excavation of memory “will disrupt, unravel, and tear down everything the Broom family has ever built. He would like, now, to live in the future and forget about the past” (24). He concludes by suggesting, “There is a lot we have subconsciously agreed that we don’t want to know” (24). Thus, memory is tightly linked to forgetting. As the youngest of 12 children, Broom feels the most disconnected from her family’s history, particularly because of the absence of her father. 

Racism and Discrimination in New Orleans East

Race shapes New Orleans. Broom writes, “[M]uch of what is great and praised about the city comes at the expense of its native black people, who are, more often than not, underemployed, underpaid, sometimes suffocated by the mythology that hides the city’s dysfunction and hopelessness” (394). She uses her family’s experience to highlight the structural inequality and discrimination in New Orleans. Her examples are varied: She examines colorism in her own family, the impact of segregation on three generations, and neighborhood zoning, to name a few. For instance, she writes about her own family’s experience of segregation and how it affected their education. She concludes that “it would remain factually incorrect to describe New Orleans schools as fully integrated” (262). This method of situating her family’s history within larger historical, political, and economic shifts links the personal with the political. Broom suggests that her family’s history is one lens through which we can understand the history of New Orleans and the experience of being Black in America.

Structural inequality is also prominent in city planning. For example, New Orleans East is developed as part of a larger urban development push. Under Mayor deLesseps “Chep” Morrison, there are major infrastructure projects throughout New Orleans. Broom highlights the language used by Morrison. He calls new buildings being erected in the downtown “glass-and-class” while dismissing working class neighborhoods as “slum cancer” (82). Black and working-class neighborhoods are torn down to make space for building projects. For example, city hall is built over Louis Armstrong’s childhood neighborhood. This erases an important site of Black New Orleans history. Some of these infrastructure projects ultimately cause environmental problems. A prominent example is the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MR-GO), an infrastructure project intended to facilitate commercial growth in the region which floods during Hurricane Betsy, damaging the neighborhood. Broom highlights how Black, low-income neighborhoods are ignored and underfunded in city planning. She adds:

Everything in the East slipped—into stasis, entropy, full-blown disrepair. The oil bust in the late 1980s led to a surplus of empty apartment buildings meant for employees who would work for booming industries that never materialized. Those became subsidized housing for poor black people pushed from the city’s center, where real estate was more valuable, to its ‘eastern frontier’ (195).

After Katrina, many Black citizens of New Orleans can’t afford to return. Others are unable to get their homes rebuilt.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text