60 pages • 2 hours read
Shelley PearsallA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
This novel illustrates how enslavement in the United States was, as the title suggests, “nothing but trouble.” As Samuel remarks, “Trouble follows me like a shadow. To begin with, I was born a slave when other folks is born white. My momma was a slave and her momma a slave before that, so you can see we are nothing but a family of trouble” (1). On a basic level, enslavement required people to work for a lifetime without pay (unless they escaped or were set free), and they were forced to produce profits for others who legally “owned” them. As the property of others, enslaved people had no legal rights of their own and were abused in a variety of ways. Although plantation owners sometimes killed enslaved people outright, they suffered no repercussions and were allowed to do what they wanted with their “property.” Throughout the novel, many enslaved people express their outrage at the many injustices they are forced to endure. In addition to working for no pay, they are not allowed to leave the plantation, they have no having legal rights, they are physically abused, and they are often forcibly separated from their families. These are some of the many hardships associated with enslavement, and the intensity of this list clarifies why many enslaved people historically attempted escape despite the dangers associated with this choice.
In the very beginning of the novel, Lilly points out why the institution of slavery is inherently problematic as she tries to make Samuel understand the broader implications of his situation. As she tells him, “Being worth money means being bought and sold. You understand that, Samuel? […] You proud of the fact that yo’ black skin ain’t no different than these clothes or this wash pot? You proud it’s got a price, same as them?” (44). With this forceful diatribe, Lilly drives home the point that designating some people as the “property” of others dehumanizes those who are deemed to be property. Stripped of all rights, enslaved people were not really viewed as people at all, and their enslavers dehumanized them as a weak attempt to justify the act of enslavement. More people would take issue with the idea of enslavement if the enslaved were viewed as actual people or humans, so dehumanizing rhetoric was employed to suggest that enslaved people were not people but were instead objects or “property.” This dangerous idea led to the institution of slavery itself and was also used to justify the myriad forms of abuse that were legalized and practiced under the institution.
The novel explores the long-lasting effects of physical abuse through the repeated discussion of scars, especially Harrison’s and the river man’s scars. Symbolically, scars symbolize the fact that even after a wound is healed, a reminder of the wound remains. Just like physical abuse, emotional and psychological abuse can produce long-lasting traumatic effects and invisible scars. The emotional effects of being enslaved in the first place are therefore shown to be just as disastrous as the physical abuses that ensue. Treated as if their lives have no value beyond their ability to generate profit for people who don’t care about them, the enslaved and formerly enslaved people in the novel find many ways to rebel against the entire reprehensible institution.
Based on the experiences of the characters, one of the worst hardships of enslavement is the forcible separation of families, which is also a result of the dehumanization and objectification of enslaved people. As Samuel remarks, “Master sold Momma before I was even old enough to remember her, and two old slaves named Harrison and Lilly had to raise me up like I was one of their own, even though I wasn’t” (1). Far from being uncommon, this experience was normalized, as plantation owners would often sell family members away from each other with no concern for the trauma and long-term damage that such separations cause. As part of the dehumanizing rhetoric that was used to legally justify enslavement and rationalize the forcible separation of families, enslavers spread the lie that Black people did not experience familial love in the same way that white people did. However, the narrative of Trouble Don’t Last is designed to illustrate the deep grief and hardship that ensued from such separation. As Harrison says:
I lost as many people as there is stars on this quilt…my birth momma. Sold. My father…whipped to death…my two little sisters. One sold. One sent off as a wedding gift. My three brothers…All put in irons and sold south…And my only wife, Belle, worth more than all the stars in the sky—took away from me and never heard from again (194).
This accounting of the extreme hardships of enslavement is representative of many that are described throughout the novel, and it is clear that Samuel and Harrison can only prevent further suffering by risking a long and arduous journey to freedom.
While the novel suggests that Samuel and Harrison’s journey to freedom is worth the risks involved, their endeavor is far from easy, and they encounter many temporary challenges and long-lasting disappointments. As Samuel says, “The old slave Harrison decided to jump into trouble himself, and he tried to run away. Problem was, I had to go with him” (1). During the course of the harrowing, difficult, and life-threatening journey, the protagonists also learn that the real-life version of “freedom” differs greatly from their dreams of what it should be because racism still runs rampant and they cannot be reunited with all their loved ones, only some of them. Ultimately, freedom in Canada is not like the biblical promised land that Lilly talks about, but it is still worth fighting for.
In an attempt to recreate a plausible version of the dangers that real-life travelers on the Underground Railroad would have experienced, the author creates multiple scenarios that seriously endanger Samuel and Harrison at every turn, and not all of the dangers are human in origin. For example, the strenuous terrain and limited shelter and supplies cause Harrison to get sick with pneumonia. Similarly, wild animals pose constant threats, as do the many “wanted” notices that the Hacklers have posted along the route. Patrols are also pervasive, and their presence reflects the widespread effects of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Before 1850, some freedom seekers would escape to northern states where slavery had already been abolished. Once there, they could sometimes find ways to exist in relative safety despite the pervasiveness of racism and segregation. In 1850, however, the Fugitive Slave Act required people in northern states to report freedom seekers, which often resulted in such travelers being captured and returned to enslavement. Thus, the “free” states were no longer a safe haven, and the entire United States was therefore inhospitable to formerly enslaved people. In 1859, when this novel takes place, it was safer to escape to Canada, where the Fugitive Slave Act did not apply. This meant that freedom seekers had to undertake an even longer journey that carried much greater risks.
In addition to the harrowing journey, Harrison and Samuel find the world outside enslavement to be disappointing, as the damaging effects of racism and structural inequality still exist beyond the boundaries of the Hacklers’ plantation. As Samuel remarks, “I thought that this [place] would be better than the side we had come from. [because] all of the blackfolks over here would be free, and all of the mean whitefolks […] would be gone […] But this side of the river was full of its own kind of trouble” (109). Accordingly, they experience some form of racism from nearly everyone they meet, even those white people who aid the Underground Railroad. When a white man steals their fish, Harrison is so discouraged that he temporarily gives up on the journey because it doesn’t seem worth the risk if he can’t own himself or anything else in the north. Ultimately, they do finish the journey, and Harrison finally gets to catch fish and keep them for himself; although their new home is far from perfect, they do gain a measure of freedom and stability that they never thought to find.
Ultimately, freedom is bittersweet for most of the characters because in order to achieve it, they must part from the people they love. For example, Ordee Lee never sees his wife or sons again, and Harrison and Samuel never see Lilly again. As Samuel remarks before he finds his mother, “The only thing I could see in my mind was a big, empty field. And the free people wandering around in that field were holding nothing in their hands. If you were free of everything, what did you have left?” (184). This quote illustrates the reality that freedom can come at a high cost, and it does not have the same meaning if one is forced to leave one’s family. Although Samuel is lucky enough to find his mother, he will always miss Lilly, who was also a mother figure to him in his early years.
In Nothing But Trouble, Samuel and Harrison reach freedom by utilizing the Underground Railroad along the way from Kentucky to Canada. The Underground Railroad was not a literal railroad, nor was it a single entity. Instead, it was made up of a complex network of people who helped formerly enslaved people escape to northern states and Canada. Some participants in the Underground Railroad were themselves formerly enslaved, whereas others were free Black people, and the network also included abolitionists of all ethnicities, as well as people who were not really abolitionists. In Nothing But Trouble, the Underground Railroad is essential to Samuel and Harrison’s journey in seeking freedom, and all of these groups are represented in some form. Through this network, the protagonists access relatively safe passage to Canada and ultimately make it to freedom. However, the Underground Railroad is also shown to be unpredictable, dangerous, and imperfect, leaving those who travel by it vulnerable to all sorts of trouble.
During their journey on the Underground Railroad, Samuel and Harrison are shepherded and sheltered by a variety of people, and they utilize several methods of transportation. Such variety and unpredictability actually served as an asset; if such a long, treacherous journey could be divided into more manageable pieces, freedom seekers were less likely to be caught. Thus, Samuel and Harrison alternate between traveling in the dark or in disguise and hiding. The people who help them each have different motivations for doing so, and not all of their reasons are noble. The moral flexibility of some members of the Underground Railroad resulted in an imperfect system that did not always serve the freedom seekers who chose to travel by its routes. However, because the network was so widespread, and because not all of its members were well connected with other abolitionists, the system as a whole was impossible to shut down and therefore endured long enough to aid many freedom seekers on their way to safety.
While some of the white people who shelter Harrison and Samuel appear to be well-meaning, they also exhibit a multitude of racist tendencies and beliefs. For example, Mrs. Taylor avoids touching anything that Harrison or Samuel has touched, even when they offer to pay her in exchange for her food and assistance. Unlike her deceased husband, Mrs. Taylor is not a true abolitionist, and her racism runs deep. Even Reverend Pry and Mr. Keepheart, who are not conscious of their racially insensitive behavior, still fail to consider how their actions might harm Harrison and Samuel. They write down their stories, intending to read them to the congregation, with no regard for the negative impact this could have if word of the story reaches the Hacklers. This blatant ignorance (or indifference) illustrates the degrees of racism that existed in all parts of the United States, not just the states where enslavement was still legal.
Not all members of the Underground Railroad whom Samuel and Harrison encounter exhibit the same racist behaviors, but most still present challenges to formerly enslaved people. For example, the river man threatens everybody he picks up with a gun and knife, demanding that they do exactly as he says or else he’ll turn them back into the patrollers. When Hetty Scott doesn’t want to get her dress dirty in the mud, he simply pushes her back into the river and leaves her for the patrollers to find. This choice illustrates the fact that traveling by the Underground Railroad did not guarantee safety or freedom. Instead, leaving the plantation was just the first step in a very long, harrowing, and dangerous journey.
By Shelley Pearsall